Subframe Connector fit?? - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Mod and Custom Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2007, 10:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 118
Default

I am looking at the "Total Control" Subframe-Connector System and would like to know if anyone else has tried this system with this setup.
Application is:
68 FB Mustang
428
FPA headers
4 spd Toploader
2 1/2" dual exhaust
I may need to find a Shelby site.
68FBMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-31-2007, 03:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
frdnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario ,Canada
Posts: 2,176
Default

I haven't tried the total control but I just installed the competition engineering ones on my car and they fit awesome...I used the bolt on style and welded them on.
__________________


68 J code sprint, 408W with vic jr top end, Pro Systems 950HP Holley carb,Camshaft Innovations custom solid roller ,Hooker 6208s,Toploader,4:11 Detroit locker...
11.82@ 120.85mph
frdnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 04:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
HoosierBuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Probably in the garage
Posts: 6,266
Default

I have their subframe connectors on my '65 convertible. I also have their upper control arms. I've found TCP quality to be completely top notch. Fit and finish is excellent.

Their prices are pretty high, though.

Phil
__________________


"Two barks means faster!" Enzo
HoosierBuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 04:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BLISTIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ramona, California
Posts: 3,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierBuddy
I have their subframe connectors on my '65 convertible. I also have their upper control arms. I've found TCP quality to be completely top notch. Fit and finish is excellent.

Their prices are pretty high, though.


Phil
Kinda goes hand in hand with quality.
__________________


And of course, with the birth of the artist came the inevitable afterbirth - the critic
BLISTIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 04:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Niag Pen
Posts: 741
Default

I had to massage my Global West convertable subframe connectors with a 20 ton press to get them to fit properly.
__________________
Still plays with blocks.
68 Mustang convertable, 331,AOD, very modded
05 Mustang
010 S-crew
kechke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 05:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 118
Default

Thanks for the info. guys.
I'd rather hear the lessons learned rather than pave the way on this one.
By the way, Kechke, Massage...20 Ton press? Holy smokes,I'd like to hear one of your stories about really having to re work a part, jeez.
Blistic, nice ride, clean mixed with testosterone, or Viagra, whatever, it looks good.
68FBMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 07:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Trouble
 
Laurie_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 18,791
Default

I have TCP subframe connectors on my 68 fastback, both kits, and they fit great.


__________________


"I love it when a plan comes together!" -- Hannibal Smith

Murphy, 1968 Coupe - Concours
Trouble, 1968 Fastback - Modified
Moby, 1971 Mach I - Occasional Driver
MiniMe, 1966 Mustang Jr. - For Fun

MCA Gold Card Judge, 67-68 Concours
MCA Gold Card Judge, Modified

Chairman, MCA Judging Committee
Laurie_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 09:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,254
Default

kechke -

That's interesting. Where exactly did they have
a problem with fit? The "mule" for the 1st set
of 65/66 convert subframes was a 21,000 mile
'65 and in the three years I was there, we never
had a complaint. (and believe me, if there was so
much as a cotter pin missing, we got a phone call)
I'm wondering if your experience was fairly recent
and perhaps the 910C jig now has an issue?

ex-Global West GM
1991-1994


Illegitimi Non Carborundum- don't let the bastards
wear you down - a sentiment we used frequently in the military
__________________
As the drill sergeant said, "I taught you everything you know. I didn't teach you everything I know."

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
GT289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 09:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 118
Default

Laurie S
Thank you for the pics. Nothing like getting pics of what a system will look like on your car. Was the exhaust installed when this pic was taken?
You are a bad girl... You even painted stripes on the undercarrage, wow.
68FB
68FBMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 09:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Trouble
 
Laurie_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 18,791
Default

I removed the exhaust when I decided to stripe the underside. The exhaust shop had put a custom exhaust in there to go from the 390 and get around the subframe connectors. It looked pretty good when it was done. I had Hooker SuperComps but have now changed to FPA headers so the rest of the exhaust system is being redone, too.
__________________


"I love it when a plan comes together!" -- Hannibal Smith

Murphy, 1968 Coupe - Concours
Trouble, 1968 Fastback - Modified
Moby, 1971 Mach I - Occasional Driver
MiniMe, 1966 Mustang Jr. - For Fun

MCA Gold Card Judge, 67-68 Concours
MCA Gold Card Judge, Modified

Chairman, MCA Judging Committee
Laurie_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 11:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Haskins Ohio
Posts: 700
Default

another +5 for TCP I love mine.

jamison42166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 12:02 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 118
Default

I was afraid the exhaust wouldn't fit between the subframe connector system and the floor pans.
Looks like it will. Nuf said.
Thanks
68FBMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 12:45 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
68EFIvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,009
Default

I put on a pair of Global West connectors this summer for my convertible and the fit was horrible. I had to cut off the front mount and re-weld it back on. It had the wrong angle and would not even fit on the frame rail. Not a big issue but a pain in the butt. Other than that they were nice.
__________________
Darreld
1968 Convertible FOR SALE.
http://editions.amospublishing.com/A...spx?d=20120518

333 with 555 rwhp and 486 rwtq, EFI, Vortech V2 trim blower with 11.5 lbs of boost, H2O/Meth Injection, T56 6 speed, JMC clutch, Steeroids rack, Ron Morris Front and TCP G-bar Rear Coilovers, Cobra brakes, Boyd Magneato wheels. Basically a money pit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrqA9...ature=related#
68EFIvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 12:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT_SCODE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 7,523
Send a message via Yahoo to GT_SCODE
Default

utmostjamin1 - Sure looks good
__________________
1967 GT S-Code Fastback http://www.gtscode.com and www.SilverBullitt.com
GT_SCODE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 04:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gothand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Fulton, GA
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1 Owner
kechke -

That's interesting. Where exactly did they have
a problem with fit? The "mule" for the 1st set
of 65/66 convert subframes was a 21,000 mile
'65 and in the three years I was there, we never
had a complaint. (and believe me, if there was so
much as a cotter pin missing, we got a phone call)
I'm wondering if your experience was fairly recent
and perhaps the 910C jig now has an issue?
A few weeks ago I put on some GW subframe connectors that I purchased in 1993 or so on my '65 fastback. The only *issue* was straightening up the frame rails where they had been bent from being used as jacking points without care.

I was pleasantly surprised how well the connectors fit and conformed to the body. Granted all my GW products were purchased at that time and still have very little miles on them, I'm pleased with the quality and performance of the stuff.

Jeff
__________________
'65 2+2 EFI
gothand is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.