Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Featured Product
» Sponsors
» Network Links
»Super Springs
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Mod and Custom Forum

Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Vintage Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2008, 11:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

What is the best vehicle to do this swap from and does anyone know of a site that has a step by step in the process? Cosider my skillset and tools/facilities limited.....


Tried search and got nothing?
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 05-03-2008, 03:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The DarkSide
Posts: 7,069
Default

There is no 'perfect' candidate for a '65-66, but a fox-body 8.8" is the perfect length for a '67-'70. You have to torch off all the sway bar and coil spring stuff and weld on new spring perches at the proper distance and angle, then swap the rear yoke on your driveshaft for the one for the 8.8". Then, use 80s Ranger/Areostar brakes and axles for a 5-lug swap and it's done.

Could be *very* cheap, I've seen posi 8.8s being given away, axles and brakes are a $75 or so junkyard item, and having it set-up for leaf springs should be under $125 from a shop.
HTH
--Kyle
__________________


The squirrels in my head have spoken.
Cobra 5.0L & AOD swap, here we come.
gotstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 04:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,593
Default

Once you'rs stupid like me and go for the disc brakes, then the price starts climbing... substantially.
JohnnyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 06:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 135
Default

IIRC the Fox-body '86-93 were the correct width for the '65-66. Cheapest 5-lug conversion would be the Ranger brake/axle swap or other conversions exist.

The SN95 ('94-04) are wider (because of ABS) and a better match for '67-73. They should already come with 5-lug and disc brakes.

For both, cut off the Fox/SN95 bracketry and weld on leaf spring perches at a ~2-3* pinion angle.

You can also swap in a conventional pinion flange onto the axle from a Ford truck (~$20 on eBay) ... that way you don't have to adapt a Mustang disc-style 4-bolt pinion flange to your driveshaft.

I'm putting a 8.8 in my '70 track car, but going to make it a 3-link/coilover/panhard setup.
ponyman_66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 08:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyman_66
IIRC the Fox-body '86-93 were the correct width for the '65-66. Cheapest 5-lug conversion would be the Ranger brake/axle swap or other conversions exist.

The SN95 ('94-04) are wider (because of ABS) and a better match for '67-73. They should already come with 5-lug and disc brakes.
The Fox axle is the same legth as the 67-68.

Its an inch WIDER then the 65-66.
__________________
1989 Coupe Black X41 code 2200 original miles
1984 GT350 Turbo T-top #1978
1984 Turbo GT 418rwhp 4 banger
1966 Coupe black on black TW headed 302, AOD, 8.8 , Bullitts, Cobra brakes, Cowl hood. New project and usually giving advise, not used feeling like an idiot newbie
Progress pictures ;
http://s192.photobucket.com/albums/z253/GT350RR/66%20coupe/
Turdburgler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 09:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,414
Default

Quote:
The SN95 ('94-04) are wider (because of ABS) and a better match for '67-73. They should already come with 5-lug and disc brakes.
94-98 are about 1.5" wider than a 79-93 Fox body drum brake rear end. The added width was for the disk brakes which became standard. The 8.8 housings are the same ~85 to 98.

The 99-04 rear ends are wider by another couple/few more inches...

I have an '89 fox body rear end that I converted with 94-98 axles and disc brakes. With the Bullit rims having a deeper backspace the whole setup fits perfectly under a 68.
__________________


'68 Highland Green, custom built tubular chassis, Fox rack & pinion steering,'89 HO/331, Cobra intake, E303, AFR 165 heads / T5z spec transmission,
8.8" rear end w/ 3.27, Auburn limited slip, triangulated 4 link, QA1 coil overs front and rear, Cobra 4 wheel Disk brakes. '01 Silver Bullit wheels.
Was a coupe, now sports a fastback roof. First run 13.3 @ 107, looking for 12's...
stangg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 09:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Senior Member
 
Midlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 18,846
Default

Didn't the Fox body rear axle only come with 4-lug axles, or are there 5-lug replacements available?

Personally, I don't understand the fascination with the 8.8" rear end, as I've been told it is not nearly as strong as the 8" and especially the 9" rear end.
__________________


'Electrical Guru: Let me Check Your Shorts! Ooops...that didn't turn out right.

I paid too much.

The Power of Midlife is Absolute!

MCA Board of Directors, and MCA Historian

Midlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 10:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

Damn, so I'll go with the fox body. I have a donor Mark VII that I was hoping to use.

Car Craft says that the Faox Body is 31/64ths wider than a stock Ford 8in.
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 10:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

Here's a good article Midlife...

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...end/index.html
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 10:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

stangg since we've been sharing so much can you share your parts list on that swap?
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 10:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,414
Default

Midlife, the 8.8s went back to 5 lug in '94. In my case I the rear end was practically free until I decided to upgrade it.

Jarretsdad, my application probably isn't a good reference since I made a rear subframe to hook up the 4 link and use coil over shocks as opposed to leafsprings. Also I was able to use the stock Fox driveshaft since my engine sits about 3-4 inches back from stock...

If you already have the Mach VII rear end with disk brakes, then I think you are good to go. IIRC the rear end housing is the same as the fox mustang and T-Bird, the axles should be the same as the 94-98 Mustangs. With the added width, the only concern would be wheels. If you run something like the Bullit wheels with 5.72 back spacing then you should be fine. There are a ton of wheel options, just about any late model mustang wheel should work. For the front your probably going to need wheel spacers to compensate for the deeper wheel backspace.
__________________


'68 Highland Green, custom built tubular chassis, Fox rack & pinion steering,'89 HO/331, Cobra intake, E303, AFR 165 heads / T5z spec transmission,
8.8" rear end w/ 3.27, Auburn limited slip, triangulated 4 link, QA1 coil overs front and rear, Cobra 4 wheel Disk brakes. '01 Silver Bullit wheels.
Was a coupe, now sports a fastback roof. First run 13.3 @ 107, looking for 12's...
stangg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 10:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

Dude you are so gonna be my bestest buddy.

I want to use everything I can from the Mark VII.
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 11:05 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The DarkSide
Posts: 7,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jarrettdad
Dude you are so gonna be my bestest buddy.

I want to use everything I can from the Mark VII.
Good plan! I'd toss the Mk7 axles and use ranger axles and some brake adapter brackets...volia, a fox-body rear with Mk7 discs

Oh *****...I have one of those in my junk pile...thanks for the idea!
__________________


The squirrels in my head have spoken.
Cobra 5.0L & AOD swap, here we come.
gotstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 11:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 107
Default

I'm already using the 5.0 and AOD. Now I'm going to keep the 8.8. Anything else I can use?

Driveshaft? E-Brake setup?
__________________
jarrettdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 11:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,414
Default

No need to rework the Mach VII brakes / axles if he plans to use late model wheels... I haven't rolled my rear quarter and have about 5/8" clearance. If the same holds true with the Mach VII rear, he could possibly get away with rolling the quarters, to fit even the mach 7 wheels underneath... but I think those are only 16 x 7" wide rims. The best thing to do is measure the outside tire to tire on both rear end setups to insure you have good clearance.
__________________


'68 Highland Green, custom built tubular chassis, Fox rack & pinion steering,'89 HO/331, Cobra intake, E303, AFR 165 heads / T5z spec transmission,
8.8" rear end w/ 3.27, Auburn limited slip, triangulated 4 link, QA1 coil overs front and rear, Cobra 4 wheel Disk brakes. '01 Silver Bullit wheels.
Was a coupe, now sports a fastback roof. First run 13.3 @ 107, looking for 12's...
stangg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.1 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.