Stainless headers, ebay - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Mod and Custom Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2012, 05:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stroudsburg PA
Posts: 120
Default Stainless headers, ebay

Just received a set of stainless headers listed on ebay for $249.95 with free shipping and thought I would share since I'm sure there are plenty of members curious of the extremely reasonable price. They are listed as Procomp PC5061 headers for small block ford. The headers were delivered in five days. here's what I found since I couldn't find any info online. The headers look great, just like the picture. They include stainless bolts for mounting to the engine and collectors. Composition, decent quality gaskets are also included (I intend to use copper gaskets instead). The welding appears to be a decent quality. The collectors are 3" and neck down to 2 1/4". the header flanges are 3/8" thick and I'm eyeballing the tubes at 18 gauge stainless. The only drawback so far (it will be a few weeks till they are installed) is the flanges do not appear to be stainless. They have the same coloration but don't have the grain of stainless and are magnetic. At this point I am unsure of the corrosion resistance of the flanges but overall they still seem to offer a great value. I'll let you know how they fit.
restodude is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-22-2012, 06:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
miketyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cedar Hill, Texas
Posts: 1,722
Default

What year model car are they going in?
miketyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 10:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 483
Default

I bought the stainless 65 long tubes for like 229... Fit and finish is AMAZING. They bolted RIGHT in w/ zero headaches, look awesome, sound great and were worth every penny. One of the very few projects on this whole car that were trouble free.
__________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves!

One Man, One Arm, One Car...
(and one laptop to Google "How-To everything"...
1965 Fastback which I restomodded/murdered in my garage...

In just one year!

theman1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 01:48 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Monzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada,Ontario
Posts: 553
Default

All stainless steel is magnetic, ferrous.
Monzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 03:35 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Maxd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 319
Default

How about a link
__________________
I think I have carport tunnel syndrom
Maxd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 07:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress, Tx
Posts: 621
Default

You typically don't want stainless flanges due to it's rate of expansion. You'll forever be tightening the header bolts. 304 Stainless(which is what almost all affordable headers are made from) elongates as it's heated in comparison to alloys with lower coefficient of expansion such as carbon steel or a stabilized stainless such as 321(which uses titanium as the stabilizing alloy). Problem with 321 is price, as it's 4-5 times as expensive as 304. FWIW, even a 304 stainless flange pair alone would run close to $150, so you can see another reason why your set wouldn't get them. Don't worry, you're better off with the carbon steel for a driver.

Here's a trick I learned when I started fabricating turbo system components out of stainless 10-12 years ago. Before you run the engine, spray WD40 on the entire header set, let it soak in, then wipe off the residual. When the engine is run, the headers will take that golden hue that stainless is famous for.
__________________
Shane Hill
shaneh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 09:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: near Austin, TX
Posts: 3,833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaneh View Post
You typically don't want stainless flanges due to it's rate of expansion. You'll forever be tightening the header bolts............"
...and this is why you don't want to use those shiny stainless header bolts either. They loosen too easily if you tighten them correctly, and are terrible at galling if you over tighten. Get some black oxide coated bolts and you will be happier.

Z.
__________________
'65 HiPo fastback
zray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 09:36 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
64NAHALF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cornwall NY
Posts: 413
Default

Does anyone know if these work with the cable clutch conversion?
__________________

64.5 Coupe (owned since 1998)
302 / T5, 9inch Rear 3:50 Traction Lok, Shelby style glass packs, Granada Disk, Full MSD Set Up, Nightmist Blue
GT Wanna Be
64NAHALF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 09:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 17
Default

Does anyone know if those headers will work with an AOD and a Unisteer manual rack?
JESTER43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 02:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buening's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stinky Town, IL
Posts: 8,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaneh View Post
You typically don't want stainless flanges due to it's rate of expansion. You'll forever be tightening the header bolts. 304 Stainless(which is what almost all affordable headers are made from) elongates as it's heated in comparison to alloys with lower coefficient of expansion such as carbon steel or a stabilized stainless such as 321(which uses titanium as the stabilizing alloy). Problem with 321 is price, as it's 4-5 times as expensive as 304. FWIW, even a 304 stainless flange pair alone would run close to $150, so you can see another reason why your set wouldn't get them. Don't worry, you're better off with the carbon steel for a driver.

Here's a trick I learned when I started fabricating turbo system components out of stainless 10-12 years ago. Before you run the engine, spray WD40 on the entire header set, let it soak in, then wipe off the residual. When the engine is run, the headers will take that golden hue that stainless is famous for.
Good info! Thanks for sharing
__________________
70 Mach 1 - 351w/T-56
70 SportsRoof - 302/C4
05 F150 FX4
06 BMW 530xi

T56 Conversion Thread
Custom Motor Mount Build Thread
buening is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 10:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
66sprint200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S.C. Kansas
Posts: 1,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monzy View Post
All stainless steel is magnetic, ferrous.
I worked 21 years designing products from 300 series of stainless steel which was nonmagnetic. Dean
Magnetic Behavior of Stainless Steels, Austenitic, Ferritic, Martensitic, and Precipitation Hardenable Stainless Steels
__________________
'66 Sprint 200 deluxe interior hardtop ( not a coupe ), owned since '84 as first car
'66 factory GT A code 4 speed fastback
66sprint200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 11:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 267
Default

Any updates on the corrosion of the flange with the stainless ? I am looking at picking up a set too.

Seems they, make a ceramic coated version now also . Anyone have those ?
__________________
1989 Coupe Black X41 code 2200 original miles
1984 GT350 Turbo T-top #1978
1984 Turbo GT 418rwhp 4 banger
1966 Coupe black on black TW headed 302, AOD, 8.8 , Bullitts, Cobra brakes, Cowl hood. New project and usually giving advise, not used feeling like an idiot newbie
Progress pictures ;
http://s192.photobucket.com/albums/z253/GT350RR/66%20coupe/
Turdburgler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 01:21 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 9,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zray View Post
...and this is why you don't want to use those shiny stainless header bolts either. They loosen too easily if you tighten them correctly, and are terrible at galling if you over tighten. Get some black oxide coated bolts and you will be happier.

Z.
+100 on aluminum heads.
__________________
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/signaturepics/sigpic19079_1.gif

6F09A 63A 8 26 09D 71 1 5
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 07:08 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deviousfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 648
Default

Can you provide a link to the headers you are referring to.
__________________
My Projects
Deviousfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 07:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
j persons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Natchitoches, La
Posts: 483
Default

I've used ARP stainless header bolts for years and have never had one of them gall, even in aluminum heads. The trick is to use a dab of anti seize on the threads. Tighten them down when you first install and check them after the first couple of heat cycles. You should be under the hood checking things out at least once a month anyway, so just add header bolts to your list. Or you can get ARP stainless header bolts with that are drilled for a lock wire and never have to look at them again. There are also locking washers of various types if you want to go that route.
__________________
John
'97 TBird project. AED supercharger, forged bottom end. Runs high 11's, when it runs.
j persons is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.