6 cyl exhaust manifold quetion! - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2004, 11:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
67mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central, TX
Posts: 683
Default

I know there are not a lot of I6 guys here but I need some help.

I have two exhaust manifolds for my I6. One is a C3DE-8430-A and the other is a C8DE-9430-A. I know the C8 is from 68 and the C3 is a casting from 63. they are totaly different castings. First WHY and second anyone know which one is correct for a 67? BTW the engine is a 68 and I am trying to make it look like a 67 So I would assume the C3.

__________________
67 Fastback project using a 69 Mach 1 for parts.
67mach is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-18-2004, 12:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 359
Default

my 66 has C3, so I would go with that.

James
__________________
Turning my dream into reality.
lotharthered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 12:25 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aloha, OR
Posts: 1,258
Default

Both are from Falcons, I can tell you that. To be correct for a '67, I'd guess the C3 casting one. But to be correct for the engine, the C8. I don't know if there were any changes to the straight-6 in those few years, but I'd think it would be better to go with the C8 one, to stay with the engine, you know?
__________________

'70 Fastback, 302 4v, Auto - Sold

2005 Pontiac Sunfire, 2.2L, 5 speed, Electric Blue
brad_65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 01:06 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 532
Default

The 65 through 67 Mustang 6 cylinder manifolds have one less longer bolt to mount it. The center two ports are different. I also believe the diameter of the exhuast port is larger on the 68. It may have been a design change due the early ones cracking.
__________________
Mike


[ b]65' Coupe, I6, AT, PS, PB, Fact. AC

67' Coupe, I6, AT, PS, Fact. AC

68' GT/CS, 289, AT, PS, PDB, Fact. AC

[/b]
[color:"red"]MCA # 59072[/color]

mmarsalone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 03:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dailydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 3,590
Default

I'd guess that the early one came off of a Falcon, with the 144, or 170, instead of the 200. Even some of the early Mustangs came with a 170. So, I'm guessing that the early one may not flow as much as the later one. I'd go with the C8.
__________________
Ken

"Get your facts straight first, then you can distort them as much as you wish"!!


1965 Fastback, Sunlit Gold, I6, T-5, Pertronix, CAA AC, SSBC frt discs
dailydriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 11:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 54
Default

My '67 200ci has the C3DE-9430-A.

HTH

-Magnus
Magnus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
67mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central, TX
Posts: 683
Default

Thanks, I think that is the one I am going with. The C8 uint does seem to have larger ports and a bigger "box" for the 3,4 cylenders. But, My goal is to make it look like a 67.

Thanks,

Thomas
__________________
67 Fastback project using a 69 Mach 1 for parts.
67mach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:50 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
67mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central, TX
Posts: 683
Default

it looks like you are correct. The 68 has larger ports and the center chamber is bigger. I Think I am going to use the 63 style though. It is correct for a 67.

Thanks
__________________
67 Fastback project using a 69 Mach 1 for parts.
67mach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
67mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central, TX
Posts: 683
Default

Im trying to make the engine look more like the 67 style engine. Changing valve cover, air cleaner and what ever else looks like a 68. While the block and the intake show C8 the rest will/should look like the 67.

Thanks though,
THomas
__________________
67 Fastback project using a 69 Mach 1 for parts.
67mach is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.