What he said. On a side note, in 1967 Shelby decided not to use the Tri-Ys. Instead, he left the hipo manifolds in place. What's interesting, is that the claimed HP output for the '67 is the same as previous models.
Apologies for leading this thread astray from original message, but in reply to the 67 non Tri-Y header post, this is of course true about standard K-code manifolds being retained by Shelby on the 67 GT-350, but I seem to recall noticing that Tony Branda had in his catalog a Tri-Y setup used with some sort of adaptor he sold, which would allow the headers to work with power steering. I would presume, then, that this header/p.s. adaptor setup would also backdate from a 67 back to the 64.5-66 model years as well. This would allow a K-code (or any other 289 V8, for that matter) to be made similar to 65-66 GT-350 motors and still retain p. steering. Anyother VMF'ers able to verify this?
67 Fastback GT -- original colour (Frost Turquoise), orig engine, .. . 1st pic is the car as it now is. Stock except for Opentracker roller perches and idler arm, roller bearing pedal cluster, Cibie lights, radials, that sort of thing..
2nd pic is of me and the same Mustang - May '67, with original F70-14 Wide Ovals.
The 67's with Tri-y's: the power steering ram needs to be dropped 2" on the left side. Most sellers of Tri-y's sell this bracket too. There is no problem with the power steering pump at all with headers.
67 GT 350 (#0036)("Miss July" 2004) owned since 1971. And I still drive it...SAAC 29 Concours GOLD, Div II, MCA Concours Trailered Gold 2X,
Also: 67 GTA S code COUPE (under construction)
General Shelby and Mustang enthusiast, MCA certified Concours judge
I think the '65 Shelby engine mods also ought to include the side pipes with glass pack mufflers and no cross-over. I'm not sure if this mod was a horsepower adder or a horsepower subtractor. Another power-related mod was the hood scoop. Some sources also mention a dual-point distributor.
Shelby also swapped out the factory toploader for a Borg Warner T-10, removed the back seat, and added overrider traction bars. A 3.89:1 gear was standard, with a 4.11 a no-cost option. Both ratios came with a mandatory Detroit locker.
Removing the back seat would subtract a few pounds. I don't know if the T-10 subtracts weight or adds it. I don't know the effect of a T-10 on rearwheel hp either. The traction bars and gear would definitely help in the quarter mile, and the locker might also help. (I'm not sure if lsd really helps ET's with such low output engines.)
Speaking of output, a GT350 tested by Car & Driver in May 1965 trapped at 95 mph, which with a 3030 lb as-tested weight calculates as 202 rwhp, 253 fwhp. (rwhp = weight x (trap speed/234)^3.)
Whatever the output of the '65 GT350, no one had more experience or success with the Ford 289 than Shelby American. The regular production 289 Shelby Cobras had been running a K-code 289 with the same mods as the GT350 got, since '62 or '63. In racing form, 289-powered GT350R's, Cobras, Daytona Coupes, and Shelby managed GT-40s won just about every series in which they competed.
The kids' '65 at Marin headlands 1-9-05
The dual point dizzy was actually a k-code thing. The T-10 was lighter than the toploader, but it wasn't as reliable.
K-codes, GT-350s, Boss 302s, Z-28s, etc. weren't really drag cars. They didn't really have the low end torque needed. I think that a stock K-code actually has more torque than a Boss 302, probably because of the smaller valves.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.