185cc vs 165 cc ARF heads for a 289/302: performance difference? - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2007, 07:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreatur, GA
Posts: 123
Default

have an eye on a set on new in-the-box 185cc heads for a good price. I know everyone recs the 165cc heads: much difference in performance on a 289/302? Thanks. cb
chipinatlanta is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-05-2007, 07:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 713
Default

I don't have AFR's, but have done a lot of reading about them. The 165 and the 185 can both come with 58 or 61cc combustion chamber, but the 165 has a 1.900 intake valve, whereas the 185 has a 2.020 intake valve. They both have a 1.600 exhaust valve, so there isn't really a big difference in the two heads save for the intake valve. If you have a chance to pick up some 185's for a good deal, then I wouldn't hesitate to get them.
__________________
http://theserviceadvisor.com/Mustang2.jpg
1966 red fastback.
Gingerstang is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 07:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
monkeystash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 2,485
Default

As great as they are, the 185cc's are a lot of head for a 289/302. Especially if you have a stock to mild cam. To really utilze the power potential of the 185's, you'd have to spin that 289/302 pretty high and have other engine components that can match that. Unless you plan on changing cams, intake, and exhaust (assuming stock,) you'd be better off with the 165's.
__________________
-Ryan
monkeystash is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 08:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 713
Default

Oh, I was assuming the engine was not a stock engine. Yeah, if it is, then use the cheaper GT40 heads.
__________________
http://theserviceadvisor.com/Mustang2.jpg
1966 red fastback.
Gingerstang is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 08:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreatur, GA
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeystash
As great as they are, the 185cc's are a lot of head for a 289/302. Especially if you have a stock to mild cam. To really utilze the power potential of the 185's, you'd have to spin that 289/302 pretty high and have other engine components that can match that. Unless you plan on changing cams, intake, and exhaust (assuming stock,) you'd be better off with the 165's.
Has tube headers, an Edelbrock carb and aftermarket intake (not sure model): willing to change cam to perk up the the ole 289.

BTW what cam would be recommended. Comp seems to be the consistent favorite, but wheich model with what charistics. And how about rocers?

This is a learning process TY cb
chipinatlanta is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 09:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mcdonough,ga
Posts: 56
Default

i have a 331 stroker w/ a xtreme energy 230/234 duration 509/512 lift cam, which heads would be best for my engine..it will get raced maybe 2 or 3 times a month if that..it has a 600 cfm carb c4 headers and high flow water pump..those are the other engine mods. i was thinking the 185's.?.?.
austin68 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 09:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
monkeystash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 2,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbering
Has tube headers, an Edelbrock carb and aftermarket intake (not sure model): willing to change cam to perk up the the ole 289.

BTW what cam would be recommended. Comp seems to be the consistent favorite, but wheich model with what charistics. And how about rocers?

This is a learning process TY cb
I still think that the 165's are your best bet. 185cc's is a lot of intake port volume for a 289/302 that doesn't see North of 6000rpms.

Cams are a science, it's hard to just pick one. All cam mfgs have tech departments that can assist you in picking the best for your engine.
__________________
-Ryan
monkeystash is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 09:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
monkeystash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 2,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68austang
i have a 331 stroker w/ a xtreme energy 230/234 duration 509/512 lift cam, which heads would be best for my engine..it will get raced maybe 2 or 3 times a month if that..it has a 600 cfm carb c4 headers and high flow water pump..those are the other engine mods. i was thinking the 185's.?.?.
I think you could get away with 185's. I might upgrade to a 650cfm and 3000 stall converter if you do. That'll be a monster!
__________________
-Ryan
monkeystash is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 10:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
htwheelz67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: mission viejo, ca
Posts: 1,293
Default

unless you want to notch pistons go the 165's, the 185's are too much for a 289 unless you are turning real high rpms. I'm a really big fan of TW heads, with twisted wedge heads you can have the 202 int valves, high velocity ports so it wont hurt bottom end torque/hp, they will perform better than 165's and will clear stock pistons with cams 220-224 duration @050 and they are about 300-400 cheaper than 165's.
htwheelz67 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-05-2007, 11:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreatur, GA
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph
unless you want to notch pistons go the 165's, the 185's are too much for a 289 unless you are turning real high rpms. I'm a really big fan of TW heads, with twisted wedge heads you can have the 202 int valves, high velocity ports so it wont hurt bottom end torque/hp, they will perform better than 165's and will clear stock pistons with cams 220-224 duration @050 and they are about 300-400 cheaper than 165's.
will the pistons have to be notched with the 185 heads?? cb
chipinatlanta is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-06-2007, 12:37 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
htwheelz67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: mission viejo, ca
Posts: 1,293
Default

a lot of time they do it depends on cam etc......
htwheelz67 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-06-2007, 02:38 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
CrackrStang71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: austin, texas (ATX!)
Posts: 991
Default

I dont think the 185's will hurt you, performace wise.

Here is a comparison of the 165's vs 185's.

http://airflowresearch.com/articles/article102/A-P1.htm

I will say, that this was on a 347 and not a 302, if that makes any difference in your decision.

The problem you will want to look into, is that with the larger valves of the 185's and assuming those are stock pistons, you would probably have to have your pistons flycut, which is not really fun. Shouldn't have that problem with the 165's from past researching and reading I've done on this forum and other forums.


Chaz
__________________
'71 Fastback
9in 31 spline 4.30 Winters Performance True Trac, 4r70w manual valve body and hardened gear set, 408w roller with ~11.2 Canfields, MME cam, Aluminum MMC driveshaft, 3" Exhaust.
CrackrStang71 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-06-2007, 08:42 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tunkhannock PA
Posts: 11,712
Default

No offense but I find a little humor in this post. You're looking to purchase a set of 185 heads because you can get a deal on them. However how much are you going to spend to make this bargain work? Adding a bigger cam, possible flycutting pistons. Are you going to flycut used cast pistons? Now that you've torn the engine apart are you going to leave it as is or put new bearings in it? Would you bore the engine out and add fordge pistons because you'll have a high RPM screamer? Looser converter, steeper gears all need to be added in as well to make this package work.

Rebuilding and porting your stock heads would probable be sufficient but again praticality rears it's ungle head because the amount you'd spent on refurbishing the stockers, would be a very nice down payment on a set of aluminum. IMO, buy the right head to begin with, you be way ahead then trying to make a bargain work.
__________________
Tom


Rehab is for quiters!

Huskinhano is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-06-2007, 07:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreatur, GA
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskinhano
No offense but I find a little humor in this post. You're looking to purchase a set of 185 heads because you can get a deal on them. However how much are you going to spend to make this bargain work? Adding a bigger cam, possible flycutting pistons. Are you going to flycut used cast pistons? Now that you've torn the engine apart are you going to leave it as is or put new bearings in it? Would you bore the engine out and add fordge pistons because you'll have a high RPM screamer? Looser converter, steeper gears all need to be added in as well to make this package work.

Rebuilding and porting your stock heads would probable be sufficient but again praticality rears it's ungle head because the amount you'd spent on refurbishing the stockers, would be a very nice down payment on a set of aluminum. IMO, buy the right head to begin with, you be way ahead then trying to make a bargain work.
point well taken: but I do have a 302 HO sitting here. And the heads that I am looking at are $550 in the box vs $1375 for new.

Does this change the equation?
chipinatlanta is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-06-2007, 08:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11,775
Default

$550? Grab em up!! Send'em to me.
JohnnyK is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.