Changing a 302 Firing Order to Windsor - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2008, 10:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 134
Default

Hey all.

Ive been looking around for a cam recently for my engine, and I called Comp Cams "CamHelp" line and one of the questions the gentleman asked me was if I wanted the standard firing order or the Windsor firing order. I understand the difference but has anyone done it and recommend it? he said its smoother and will increase power a little. Ive been searching and all I really found was this quote from a website...

"A stock 351 Windsor cam was a popular low-buck performance gainer for 289 and 302 engines once upon a time. It smoothed out the engine and gave a better feel throughout the useable rpm range." (http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/a...hp/t-1525.html) ..the source.

Thanks for any help, and as always any insight is appreciated.
-Sean K.
__________________
Ford64Muscle (my old username)

'70 Mustang Fastback
-1971 Boss 302 Service Block Blueprinted
-AUS 351 Cleveland Heads
-Custom Ross pistons
-3 speed toploader

'64 1/2 Mustang Coupe (Rusty and in Pieces For Now)
Ford70Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-12-2008, 11:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: frankfort ky
Posts: 1,526
Default

well ford did just that when they went to the roller cammed engines in 1985. remember they had a reason for doing it too.
__________________
aka carlite65
C7ZZ-F is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 11:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
frdnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario ,Canada
Posts: 3,120
Default

I don't think it makes much difference either way.
__________________

68 J code sprint, 408W
11.59@ 120.95mph in street trim.
frdnut is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 11:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
RTM
Senior Member
 
RTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 4,511
Default

i was always told that the 351w reduces the load on the front of the crank snout because the firing order is not 1-5 like on a 302 engine. not sure how much merit this carrys but it always sounded like a good enough reason.
RTM is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 06:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
eyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 561
Default

I did it on my smallblock. The difference is not noticeable but by the same token, I can say that there are no detrimental effects from doing it, either.

Just make sure whenever someone else works on the car, that they are aware of the change.
__________________
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying."
- Woody Allen

eyster is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 08:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
johnpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Roseville, California
Posts: 25,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RTM
i was always told that the 351w reduces the load on the front of the crank snout because the firing order is not 1-5 like on a 302 engine. not sure how much merit this carrys but it always sounded like a good enough reason.
It is my understanding that this is why Ford changed the firing order ... better bearing life.

I doubt it makes any difference in performance or idle quality. If it does, you'd need a dyno to tell the difference.

The only real draw back to going to the 351w firing order, is that your plug wires won't fit any more. If you're replacing plug wires, though, there's really no reason not to go to the newer firing order.
__________________
VMF Jedi Knight who's spirit will be with us forever.
johnpro is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 08:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
silverblueBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 5,803
Default

I have the 351 firing order in my 289, no problems for me.
__________________
-Mark-

1966 Mustang 2+2
silverblueBP is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 10:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Albany CA
Posts: 1,213
Default

This is the same thing that the Chevy guys call a 4/7 swap. The 4/7 swap turns the standard Gen I SBC firing order of 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2 to the Gen III (LSx) firing order of 1-8-7-3-6-5-4-2 -- the no. 4 and the no. 7 change places. (Keep in mind GM numbers the cylinders 2-4-6-8 on the passenger side and 1-3-5-7 on the driver side.)

Here's a Hot Rod magazine story on a side-by-side comparison.

180 Out is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2008, 10:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Posts: 4,670
Default

+1 on what Johnpro said. It will give you better bearing life.
__________________
69 Mach 1 427 Windsor,T-56 6 Speed,4.56 Traction Loc

http://memimage.cardomain.com/member...81_21_full.jpg
mod9 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-13-2008, 07:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
horsehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: FORD COUNTRY
Posts: 3,508
Default

I built a 302 a couple of years ago and put in the 351W cam and it seem to me the motor twisted up to higher RPM faster and was smoother. I just built another 302 and put in a 351 W cam. Haven't stated yet but sure I will be happy. Jim
__________________
.................................................. ................Mildly built 302, 4 speed, Mallory 6AL, '74 Maverick rear w/3.40 gears. 15X7'' & 15X10'' Pro-Stars, Lowered 1'' all around. Pic. taken at Horsehead overlook on Skyline Drive, not far from home... My website-- www.usedmustangparts.net
horsehead is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.