Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Featured Product
» Sponsors
» Network Links
»Super Springs
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum

Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Vintage Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2009, 08:54 PM   #31 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

it actually runs better WOT than anything, no misses that i can tell of and it pulls pretty hard. You got any places to look for a leak that I might be missing or how to detect it?
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 11-02-2009, 09:18 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Has this always been a problem with this engine, or is it new?
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 09:50 PM   #33 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

i dont remember it early on, i have been building this car for 2.5 years, finally done, it has about 600 miles on it total since i drove it a little bit once it was streetable. But I do remember putting a fancy PCV valve in the valve cover from summit racing...it is in the passenger side valve cover and has a hose that runs into the base of the carbeurator. Is that supposed to run into the air filter instead?
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 10:13 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

PCV usually goes to the carb base or to the carb spacer between it and the intake manifold, if so equipped. Just for the heck of it, plug the hose and see what happens. The system is designed to work with the air from the PCV but the result might indicate a vacuum leak elsewhere. It won't hurt the engine.

Normally, in a closed system, there is a hose from the air filter housing to a valve cover breather/oil separator. Under vacuum induced by the engine intake process, fresh air is drawn into the engine and crankcase fumes are drawn out through the PCV valve and into the intake manifold, where they join the air/fuel mixture and are burned in the engine.
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 10:27 PM   #35 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

let me clarify this because i think we have found the problem...

A typical PCV valve for a normal car would probably expect to see about 20-22 inches of vacuum at idle, however, my cam is only expected to produce 12 inches at idle, which means that the spring in the valve would overcome the vaccum and open, creating a huge vacuum leak. That would also make a lean mixture in the intake and hard to idle cause a need for more advance. Now when i put it in gear, the load increases on the engine, vacuum drops even more, aggravating the situation and opening the PCV valve further, creating a larger vacuum leak and there is my problem.

That would make sense why it runs pretty good WOT because the valve would be open anyway to let the blowby back into the intake. That is what I get for buying the shiny universal PCV from summit.

What do you think?
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 10:50 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Like I said, remove the PCV and try it. You won't break it

Here's what I do on the race car:


Two oil separators tied together into one hose going to a puke tank. Note the breather on the puke tank. In the old days people just ran breathers on the valve covers and vented to atmosphere. Stinky but simple.

Sometimes you have to get simple to find a problem. You should end up rich when you block the PCV. If you're not, I still think there's a vacuum leak somewhere.
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:33 AM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,103
Default

Is that a thermos with a breather on it? ...

kdillard21, do what Pat said and cap the PCV hose where it goes into the the back base of the carb and run it. Is it better or worse? This sounds like classic vacuum leak.

You might want to fill out your profile with the details of your car and engine set-up.
__________________

**Never drive faster then your guardian angel can fly**
whisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:37 AM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Hey, Hal, alive and well you are

Nice to see some of the old farts are still around....

OP, do you have a spacer under your carb?
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:43 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,103
Default

Hi Pat, and getting older every day. Dang, I can build a brand new 1965 Mustang from parts, how can I build a brand new old guy? Where IS that catalog? .....

OP, If it falls to an idle slowly then that points to a vacuum leak. Only problem with that is normally a vacuum leak wouldn't let the idle drop clear down like yours is aparently doing. Are you running a Pertronix ignitor in the distributor? I noticed you were talking about the coil as if it were replaced and many times people install those together and incorrectly.
__________________

**Never drive faster then your guardian angel can fly**
whisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:48 PM   #40 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

As a matter of fact I do have a pertronix ignitor on the distributor and a flamethrower coil. How else can they be hooked up? I thought it was straightforward...
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:56 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Did you remove or bypass the ballast resistor/wire when installing the Pertronix?

I doubt it's the cause of your idle problems but anything is possible. Usually, Pertronix issues show up under high cylinder pressure conditions....
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:17 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

I never had a ballast wire, I am using a single wire alternator and a painless performance wiring kit, so everything was new, but the flamethrower coil didn't require a ballast resistor anyway in the instructions. And the PVC troubleshooting didn't change anything, idled the same after plugging it.
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:36 PM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Hal, if you're still reading, what do you think of re-torquing the intake, test, and then running the pre-load on the valves?

OP, do you have an automatic trans and/or power brakes? Right....you have an AOD. Is that a computerized trans or does it have a vacuum modulator?
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:07 PM   #44 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Default

Already retorqued the manifold (a couple of times actually just to make sure) 20 ft/lbs. The brakes are manual and the transmission is an AOD, no computer or vacuum modulator (just a throttle valve cable that controls shifts). Ironically, whether I set the idle out of gear at 850rpm or 1050rpm, it drops to 650 rpm when its put in gear. That makes no sense to me.

Last edited by kdillard21; 11-03-2009 at 07:13 PM.
kdillard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:08 PM   #45 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central California
Posts: 10,183
Send a message via ICQ to camachinist Send a message via AIM to camachinist Send a message via Yahoo to camachinist
Default

Since the issue wasn't apparent when the engine was new, something must have changed. We've eliminated nearly all of the easy stuff.

When you put the new carb on, how did you set the idle mixture? Also, out of curiosity, if you were to unscrew the idle speed screw until the throttle plates bottomed, how many turns would that be?
__________________

Visit my VMF lingo page
Visit the Ford engine torque specs page
Visit my MySpace Blog
camachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.1 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.