Jim Meyer Racing IFS Front Suspension - Vintage Mustang Forums

Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 01-01-2011, 11:50 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Jim Meyer Racing IFS Front Suspension

Does anyone have any experience with the Jim Meyer bolt-in MII front suspension? It appears to have just been introduced earlier this year.
Looks the same as Rod & Custom, Heidts or TCI but no welding or shock tower removal required.
Would be OK with late 80's 302/T5 swap and just shaving towers.

Link below.

Welcome to Jim Meyer Racing Products Inc.- Mustang
02HD9294 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 01-02-2011, 01:47 PM
Just some guy
GypsyR's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SC foothills, USA
Posts: 15,264
I'm guessing you missed this thread- Bolt in IFS
But no, I don't think anybody here has actually bought one. It's not really clear that they even have any actually ready to sell.
GypsyR is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 01-02-2011, 03:43 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Thanks, I did read that thread. Lots of comments but nobody who had any actual experience.
I am interested because of the lack of cutting and no welding. Not that I will go back stock but installation looks easier since I'm not a welder.
My only concern is, as the thread stated, the front supports from the crossmember look a bit flimsy and the crossmember is held on with just two bolts.
02HD9294 is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 01-02-2011, 08:32 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Colony, TX
Posts: 963
I have not seen this before... Certainly thinking outside of the box. At first I too thought the "single bolt" holding the cross member was a week point. After studying & thinking about it it in reality would be safer than the stock suspension as each lower control arm is held by a single bolt. At least with this "if" that bolt failed on one side at least the cross member is connected to the other side & braced by the strut rods mounting points preventing the wheel from just folding under.

I think an open tracker roller suspension would be much cheaper & perform just as well as this.

jmlay is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 01-02-2011, 09:09 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 353
Eyeballing it, I see:

a) Very narrow inner pivot spacing.

b) Lots of exposed rod ends and spherical bearings.

The former is bad as a general rule of suspension design, and the latter is IMO a bad idea in a street suspension both for NVH and durability reasons.

That lower crossmember attachment appears to hang the entire steering and suspension loading off the two wimpy tack-welded LCA pivots, you lose the stock lower crossmember and nothing replaces it (much less tying the LCA pivots to the subframe rails like the Cobra Automotive/Boss 302 mod crossmember.)

I don't much like that at ALL.

Last edited by JEM; 01-02-2011 at 09:17 PM.
JEM is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome