Installing heads on correct side - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Links
»Auto Transport
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2011, 12:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,178
Default Installing heads on correct side

So I'm about to bolt the heads back on my 289 and wondered if they had to be on a particular side of the block. Searches revealed that they can go on either side. However, I noticed that the spark plug holes in the heads are at an angle such that they originally faced rearward prior to disassembly so the heads aren't really swappable left to right are they?
__________________
'68 convertible restoration underway. See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-23-2011, 12:40 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 514
Default

Not sure if serious so....

Looking at the heads the plug holes face the same direction on both heads if they are placed side by side. So it follows that when you turn one head 180 degrees to get it on the other side of the engine the plug holes will face the opposite direction. In otherwords, they are interchangeable,they are identical castings and can be used oneither side; but if the heads have thermactor holes it is possible that one side is plugged and the other side has a threaded insert for accessories if that portion of the emissions system has been abandoned. Probably not an issue on vintage 289 heads.

Jafo
Jafo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 01:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
joyr1der's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ocean Beach
Posts: 168
Default

Can't help with the question....but why do you have a 289 and not a 302 ?
__________________
my '68 coupe project blog at mustang68.com
my club: bay area mustang association

joyr1der is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 02:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jafo74 View Post
Not sure if serious so....

Looking at the heads the plug holes face the same direction on both heads if they are placed side by side. So it follows that when you turn one head 180 degrees to get it on the other side of the engine the plug holes will face the opposite direction. In otherwords, they are interchangeable,they are identical castings and can be used oneither side; but if the heads have thermactor holes it is possible that one side is plugged and the other side has a threaded insert for accessories if that portion of the emissions system has been abandoned. Probably not an issue on vintage 289 heads.

Jafo
Oh duh. That makes sense. Thanks.

@joy1nder: Lol! Obviously because I'm not smart enough to own one. :-)
__________________
'68 convertible restoration underway. See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 08:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 12,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyr1der View Post
Can't help with the question....but why do you have a 289 and not a 302 ?
Lots' of 68 Mustangs had the 289 2V. Very very common.

There was no left or right 289 or 302 head. Both were the same. The head gasket is tricky, there is a front and rear. Putting one of those on backward is a disaster, the engine will overheat constantly.

The really big holes shown here at the left go at the rear end of the engine:

__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 09:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
yelostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,038
Default

More289 c-codes than any other, in 68, I believe.
yelostang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 10:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,893
Default

What? You forgot to mark them when you took them off??

Just kidding. As 22GT describes....
__________________
5F07C 65A R 26 11T 64 6 1
Recently "rescued" from the original owner after 23
years of sitting.

6F09A 63A 8 26 26D 71 1 5
A work in progress. Hopefully done next year.
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 10:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartl View Post
What? You forgot to mark them when you took them off??

Just kidding. As 22GT describes....
LOL! The funny thing is that I actually DID mark them. The engine guy must have been laughing his a$$ off when I brought them in to get new hardened seats. When I got them back, the marks were painted over! Oh no! LOL!

Oh well, live and learn.
__________________
'68 convertible restoration underway. See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 02:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 139
Default

marking your parts is always smart, even if its overkill. as posted the most important steps on installing the heads is making sure the gaskets are correct, also dont forget to chase the head bolt threads and use a good thread lube.
mustang6569 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 02:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustang6569 View Post
marking your parts is always smart, even if its overkill. as posted the most important steps on installing the heads is making sure the gaskets are correct, also dont forget to chase the head bolt threads and use a good thread lube.
Okay thanks for the tips!
__________________
'68 convertible restoration underway. See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 02:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 12,385
Default

I'll admit I've had my heads off a few times, yet I put them back where they were.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 04:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,178
Default

Another possibly stupid question: Do modern head gaskets with that rubberized-looking sealer that goes around all the gasket openings require any additional gasket sealer or are the built-in seals on the gasket good enough?

Okay, maybe just one more: I'm currently planning on using NAPA/Permatex thread sealer on the head bolts (
Amazon Amazon
) but I also have a bottle of Permatex Indian Head Shellac (
Amazon Amazon
) and a tube of Permatex Ultra-Black Hi Temp RTV (
Amazon Amazon
).

Which would you use to seal the head bolt threads? Something else?
__________________
'68 convertible restoration underway. See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655

Last edited by aolshove; 09-23-2011 at 04:28 PM.
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 04:45 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,349
Default

Unless you're installing metal head gaskets, do not use any sealer on the head gaskets.

As for the head bolts, I've heard various opinions about using sealers and lubricants. So, I'll let the forum decide as I'm no expert there.
Klutch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2011, 08:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 2,582
Default

On a later model 5.0 you must use RTV on the short outside bolts since they are open holes into the water jackets. I just use RTV on all of them so my torque readings are equal.
Not sure about an early 302 or 289. Haven't seen one of those blocks in years.
__________________
1995 GT convertible - Laser Red
1995 GT convertible - Black (Son's ride)
1966 GT Fastback under restoration
ScottsGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2011, 10:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dobrostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 742
Default

I wonder what the RTV does to the torque values. Most torque values are specified using 30 weight lubricants. If you use ARP bolts with their special lubricants, you have to find out what to torque them to from ARP - the torque is very different. I had a long discussion with my engine builder about torques and he showed me torque spec tables which specifically stated "using 30 wt oil" and the flyer that came with ARP bolts about using their torques. The issue is that with their lubricant and an shop manual torque you end up over torquing. I think that's why many late mode motors specify a preload e.g tighten so much then turn x number of turns beyond like valve adjustments on hydraulic lifters.

Not sure where RTV fits.

On the Triumph Race blog this topic was very controversial.

With respect to the heads, I would just make sure there were accessory bolts on both ends before I decided it didn't matter which side.

Last edited by dobrostang; 09-24-2011 at 10:41 AM.
dobrostang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.