dual exhaust kit for 65 mustang convertible - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2012, 04:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Belgian driver
Default dual exhaust kit for 65 mustang convertible

Hi guys,

i have a 65 mustang convertible with T5 and single exhaust. I'm looking for a dual exhaust for my car. Anyone now a great kit for my car? Magnaflow or flowmaster?

Thanks, Tom
Belgian driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-04-2012, 10:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: johnsburg, IL
Posts: 407
Default

i'm gonna go with a kit from stainless works- it's kinda pricey but they use 304 ss. and it comes in a two inch diameter {like OEM}. I'm saving up for it. John
__________________
"If you need a new machine and you don't buy it, you pay for it without getting it." -Henry Ford
64.25 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 12:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 358
Default

You should consider going to dual exhaust brake lines too. The single line gets too close to the exhaust.
65fstbpieces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 01:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 14,588
Default

The pipes get really snug above the bolt on tunnel plate. I'm also planning duals for my 68 vert 289. Since I want on the quiet side the factory 2" is fine.

Your talking possibly Flowmaster so some will advise larger pipes. Keep in mind the restricted tunnel with bolt on plate. By the way the provider of 65/66 duals generally instruct on what MUST be done with the rear brake lines.


Slim


Slim
__________________


My '64 1/2 vert. Ordered May '64. D code 4 speed, handling package, caspian blue, accent group, Ford blue manual top.

'68 vert. driver. Owned since '77. C code AT, AC, PS, P disc B, PT lime gold, standard black interior and top. NOS RF fender and left quarter.New top and folding glass.
slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 01:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65fstbpieces View Post
You should consider going to dual exhaust brake lines too. The single line gets too close to the exhaust.
Not really necessary. I turned the brake distribution block on the rear axle housing a bit and now there is enough distance between the exhaust and rear brake hose.

__________________
Erwin, The Netherlands,

66 Red Convertible,289ci 4V /C4/PDB/PS/PT. Visit my HOMEPAGE for lots of pictures.

66candy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 10:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jsm0372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 196
Default

I went with the Magnaflow 2.5" stainless kit. Worked great but as someone already mentioned clearance at the tunnel plate will be an issue. To address this I just spaced my plate down a bit with square tubing...
__________________
1965 Mustang Convertible
- Ford Motorsport GT40 Long Block (B303 cam)
- Edelbrock Super Victor Intake
- FAST XFI Sequential Fuel Injection
- Hooker Supercomp Headers (JetHot)
- 5 Speed T5z
- 9" Versailles with 4.11 posi (nodular case)
- 31-spline Moser Axles
- 4 wheel disc (Wilwood front / Wilwood rear)
- Opentracker Racing Roller UCA and LCA
- Opentracker Racing Roller Spring Perch
- Flaming River Steering Box
jsm0372 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 09:14 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Belgian driver
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsm0372 View Post
I went with the Magnaflow 2.5" stainless kit. Worked great but as someone already mentioned clearance at the tunnel plate will be an issue. To address this I just spaced my plate down a bit with square tubing...
Do you have stock manifolds or headers?
If so, what kind of headers do you have?

Thanks for the reply's

Tom
Belgian driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 10:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66candy View Post
Not really necessary. I turned the brake distribution block on the rear axle housing a bit and now there is enough distance between the exhaust and rear brake hose.
You can never have too much clearance. The stock dual setup offers a lot more than yours.

__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 10:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Medford, NJ
Posts: 188
Default

The rear brake line has to be moved. You don't say what kind of sound you are looking for - magnaflow and flowmaster are typically the first metioned. The stock 65 GT exhaust set up will sound, IMO, better than the above. If you want real "old school" get the neighbors attention, then suggest an Arvinode system.
__________________
65 factory GT A code 4 speed
SlipKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 11:04 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jsm0372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 196
Default

I have Hooker SuperComp headers. I really like the Magnaflow kit just wish I had a better muffler shop to weld/piece it together :-) Make sure you find someone that's great at welding stainless...some muffler shops say they can but end up doing a sloppy job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belgian driver View Post
Do you have stock manifolds or headers?
If so, what kind of headers do you have?

Thanks for the reply's

Tom
__________________
1965 Mustang Convertible
- Ford Motorsport GT40 Long Block (B303 cam)
- Edelbrock Super Victor Intake
- FAST XFI Sequential Fuel Injection
- Hooker Supercomp Headers (JetHot)
- 5 Speed T5z
- 9" Versailles with 4.11 posi (nodular case)
- 31-spline Moser Axles
- 4 wheel disc (Wilwood front / Wilwood rear)
- Opentracker Racing Roller UCA and LCA
- Opentracker Racing Roller Spring Perch
- Flaming River Steering Box
jsm0372 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 12:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Belgian driver
Default

I have flowmaster 40s with hooker comp headers on my '66 coupe and i love the sound but on a vert it will be to loud. i was told that the 50s and magnaflow ara not that loud.
Maybe il will go withe the stock exhaust.
Belgian driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 01:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belgian driver View Post
I have flowmaster 40s with hooker comp headers on my '66 coupe and i love the sound but on a vert it will be to loud. i was told that the 50s and magnaflow ara not that loud.
Maybe il will go withe the stock exhaust.
Depends on the effect you want. Loud noise does not actually make the car any faster. It just sounds faster.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.