Anybody know why... - Page 2 - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2012, 01:02 PM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 44
Default

I have the shell of a 69 coupe and the factory installed the torque box on top of the frame rail tab just like the first picture.

Both Dynacorn and Spectra Premium build the inner part of the front torque boxes narrower than the cp/fb. They simply aren't wide enough to mate to that tab as the second picture shows. The real question is whether Ford intended the firewall alone to tie those two pieces together there or whether there is supposed to be a doubler that fits behind the tab and the inner tb?
__________________
1969 Convertible 390
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-17-2012, 01:10 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckeyedemon View Post
could you explain how i improperly installed the piece?
By the way, I love the way this part is installed. It is exactly the way the factory installed the one on my cp.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3173.jpg (62.3 KB, 14 views)
__________________
1969 Convertible 390
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-17-2012, 04:58 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 22GT View Post
Sure- The inner, upper edge should be below the flange on the frame rail, not above it.

looks like you changed the picture. based on what i'm looking at in the picture you linked from someone else's work (and pictures from Aolshove), it appears they may have bridged the gap with a weld. so in reality the torque box someone else installed probably isn't underneath the frame rail the way you claim mine should have been (and incorrectly installed....). i'm guessing you don't have a better picture.

looking at photos posted by Aolshove, it appears the aftermarket convert torque box comes up a little short just as the op describes.

RHToeBoard1+009.jpg (image)

in another picture posted by Aolshove, it appears the original was on top of the frame rail (and not short like the aftermarket).

LHCutout_Day1+006.jpg (image)

in reality, whether a person welds it on top like original or underneath (or simply bridge the gap with a weld) it probably doesn't matter since you can't see it anyways. at most you would have to push the toe panel/firewall down the thickness of the original torque box in order to attach it to the frame rail if you put it underneath. that gap is in the noise though.
__________________
69 Mach 1 Build

buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-17-2012, 05:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,796
Default

True- I doubt it makes any difference as long as the weld is solid.
__________________
Amateur restorer. Well, sometimes I have been paid for it. But not right now.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-17-2012, 07:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 44
Default

This picture was the thing I needed. Thanks for the help guys!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LHCutout_Day1 006.jpg (97.6 KB, 18 views)
__________________
1969 Convertible 390
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-17-2012, 09:12 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: WA County, OR
Posts: 2,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninedrvr View Post
This picture was the thing I needed. Thanks for the help guys!
Ugh! That pic brings back some bad memories. LOL!
__________________
'68 convertible restoration "almost done". See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.