Anybody know why... - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2012, 02:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 34
Default Anybody know why...

The inner part of the front torque boxes on the 65-70 cp/fb overlap the front frame rail and the convertibles don't?
__________________
1969 Convertible 390 GT
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-16-2012, 04:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 14,588
Default

I'm gonna risk sounding stupid! Maybe I'll draw the real answer!
It may have something to do with verts having different structure...inner and outer rocker panel.


Slim
__________________


My '64 1/2 vert. Ordered May '64. D code 4 speed, handling package, caspian blue, accent group, Ford blue manual top.

'68 vert. driver. Owned since '77. C code AT, AC, PS, P disc B, PT lime gold, standard black interior and top. NOS RF fender and left quarter.New top and folding glass.
slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 06:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Black65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,995
Default

At least as fast as 65-66 coupes and fastbacks didn't come with them from the factory. 67's had one, 68 and up had both.
__________________
Black65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 06:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aolshove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,797
Default

I'm trying to picture what you're talking about. The front TB's of my 68 vert most definitely do overlap the front frame rail and floor extension.

Right after I welded it on:

__________________
'68 convertible restoration "almost done". See Ol' Rusty's progress at 68Vert.BlogSpot.Com

MCA #72655
aolshove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 06:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninedrvr View Post
The inner part of the front torque boxes on the 65-70 cp/fb overlap the front frame rail and the convertibles don't?
I'm reading "convertible torque boxes don't overlap the frame rail".

Except they do. The only difference between coupe and convertible torque boxes is the part that meets the inner rocker.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 34
Default

This picture shows the left side of a coupe. Notice that the torque box overlaps the left fron frame rail tab. The second isn't a very good picture but it shows a right side torque box of a convertible. Notice that it doesn't overlap the frame rail tab to the left?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3173.jpg (62.3 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF1726a.jpg (44.3 KB, 123 views)
__________________
1969 Convertible 390 GT
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
manley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eastern Indiana
Posts: 2,463
Default

I think the one on the right is designed to be added to a car that does not need the toeboard replaced, so that section is notched out. Just my theory.
__________________
Mike Manley

'69 Mustang Mach 1 - 351W 4V, 4 Speed Toploader
manley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 34
Default

I though something looked wrong but the catalog pictures show the same thing. The convertible pieces are narrower as well as being notched for the inner rockers.
__________________
1969 Convertible 390 GT
ninedrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 08:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 229
Default

Hey Guys, I think it is the structure of the car, coupes,fastback flooring sits on top,mounts to the side of rocker panels,as the convertible floor sides mounts from the bottom the rocker panels,so the tunnel section would need the extra support at the front of floor. [MAYBE]

68projectcar
68projectcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 08:37 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aolshove View Post
I'm trying to picture what you're talking about.
he's referring to this:

__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 08:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,687
Default

for starters, don't trust the accuracy or correctness of other peoples work.

i don't know about convertibles, but i have pictures showing an original 69 fastback torque box being mounted on top of the frame rail.
__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 09:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninedrvr View Post
This picture shows the left side of a coupe. Notice that the torque box overlaps the left fron frame rail tab. The second isn't a very good picture but it shows a right side torque box of a convertible. Notice that it doesn't overlap the frame rail tab to the left?
Oh! Easy answer. The one on the left is a replacement torque box, improperly installed.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 10:03 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 22GT View Post
Oh! Easy answer. The one on the left is a replacement torque box, improperly installed.
could you explain how i improperly installed the piece?
__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 10:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckeyedemon View Post
could you explain how i improperly installed the piece?
Sure- The inner, upper edge should be below the flange on the frame rail, not above it.

__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)

Last edited by 22GT; 11-17-2012 at 10:12 AM.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 10:24 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 22GT View Post
Sure- The inner, upper edge should be below the flange on the frame rail, not above it.

do you have a picture of an original 69 car (coupe, fastback, convertible)? perhaps different plants installed them differently (that would seem strange though).

here is a picture of the passenger side on the same car (dearborn 69 fastback). it should be easy to see the torque box is on top of the frame rail and the toe board gets spot welded on top of that.

__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.