65 200 DD - want to go through my brakes - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2012, 01:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Milo Bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,514
Default 65 200 DD - want to go through my brakes

Just got $200 as an early Christmas present after asking for some leaf springs... but after seeing that they're not on CJ's Black Friday sale and their brake rebuild kits are, I think I'm going to do the brakes first.

I have no signs of any problems with what's currently on the car, which is the standard four-drum manual 6-cylinder setup. It does occasionally pull to the left just a tad, and they did keep me from hitting a deer the other night. But I've never gone through them, I have no idea how long they've been on the car, and I still have a jelly jar. Plus the left rear almost failed inspection when I bought the car in January because of lacked stopping power.

I know there's already quite a bit on the forum but I wanted to put it out there for my specific application because it seems when I read old posts I end up with more questions than answers.

So, what I'm looking at is this kit:

Mustang Drum Brake Rebuild Kit 6 Cylinder 1965-1970 | CJ Pony Parts

And I already have this that I ordered some time ago for my convertible, although I need to make sure it's the same thing... I thought what I got was a '67 because the '65 kits weren't being made at that time:

Mustang Dual Bowl Master Cylinder Conversion Non Power Drum Brakes OE Steel Kit 1965-1966 | CJ Pony Parts

I've picked up some indications on here that I need to run new brake lines when I do this. Is that the case? If so, what exactly is it that I need? Is there anything else I need to get as part of this? I know there's an ongoing debate about a proportioning valve for a '69 or something like that.

Also, are there any step-by-steps out there or is the shop manual the best bet? If it's the latter, is there anything in the shop manual directions that's obsolete or not needed 48 years later?

Thanks in advance for the help.
__________________
1965 convertible, 289 C-code upgraded to 4bbl
1965 coupe, 200, T5 - daily driver

Last edited by Milo Bloom; 11-21-2012 at 01:27 PM.
Milo Bloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-21-2012, 01:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
datac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,934
Default

You shouldn't need to run new brake lines to fit that conversion kit, assuming you don't have another reason for replacing them. The CJ's dual-master kit was a simple bolt-in for me (well, as simple as can be expected manipulating very short lines in close confines in a detailed engine bay, but you get the idea).

I did basically the same thing about six months back, although not with CJ's parts. I'd highly recommend replacing all of your flex lines at the same time. I vacuumed all of the old brake fluid out of the hard lines, shot brake cleaner through them, vacuumed out any residue, and dried them thoroughly with compressed air. Make absolutely certain you mic your drums (if you have them turned, the machine shop will likely mic them for you) and replace if out of spec. This would be a good time to inspect/replace the front wheel bearings and seals while you're at it. Keep everything clean and sanitary, and remove and refinish your backing plates if they're dirty/nasty/rusty.

__________________
datac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 01:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,768
Default

To change to the 67 master, you'll need to change the lines that connect the master cylinder, along with a connector to attach the rear brake bowl to the rear brake line, and a plug for where the rear line used to be on the block. Glazier/Nolan has all that.

Glazier/Nolan has their show-correct rear springs on sale all the time- Less than $200 for the springs, eye and U bolts, and shackles.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 03:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 10,018
Default

Why not do both? GN has the leaf spring kit and all of the brake parts can be had from a discount place like Rock Auto. The only "iffy" part will be whether your drums have enough meat to be surfaced.
__________________
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/signaturepics/sigpic19079_1.gif

6F09A 63A 8 26 09D 71 1 5
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 03:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Myopic
 
dodgestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 15,124
Default

You know I have some nice 5 leaf mid-eyes sitting in the garage...just need a new centering pin
__________________
Nick
65FB 410C AOD 'D.T.'
67FB 302 FMX 'Cruiser'
68FB 351W T5 'Brute'


Let's Go Racing
11.455 at 118.85!
dodgestang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 04:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Posts: 77
Default

I recently installed the CJ dual-bowl conversion and am thrilled with the outcome. One caution I have is that it was NOT AT ALL obvious what line went to where. The only instructions in the box were on how to bench bleed the cylinder. None (and I mean zero) of the items in the kit matched the threads on anything in my car.

The kit comes with a MC and two pre-bent lines which attach to the MC. One line fits the front bowl and one the rear. It turns out that the standard for Fords is that the front bowl feeds the back and the back feeds the front, but this does not appear to be an industry standard; I read somewhere that the Corvette has the front bowl feed the front and the back bowl feed the back. I installed mine with front->front and back->back before someone told me it was wrong. I have read in some places that it really matters which bowl feeds which end of the car, but cannot find any science to back that up. So far, mine brakes as expected.

The bolts on the old MC were also too short for the new MC.

The kit leaves it to the installer to figure out what goes where. While I am happy with the results, I would not consider this a brain-dead drop in replacement for someone who has never replaced an MC before.
martyscholes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 05:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
datac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,934
Default

In my case the threads did match, so I had a pretty good clue. After a few minutes of head-scratching it all made sense and went in relatively painlessly (although there's not much flex in those short lines to get the threads started properly, and with a freshly bench-bled master ready to drip brake fluid in my freshly detailed engine bay it was plenty stressful trying to work quickly). I've heard other folks with thread issues with this kit, so it's possible there's some plant variation (mine's a late '65 San Jose car).
__________________
datac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 05:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
65fastback6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 3,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by datac View Post
there's not much flex in those short lines to get the threads started properly.
If you have the master cylinder loose from the firewall along with the junction
block where you can wiggle them as you are starting the threads it will make
it much easier.
__________________

65 Fastback 2+2 Rangoon red, red interior
6 cyl, AT, A/C, P.S., P.B.
13" 4 lug wheels with spinner wheel covers

MCA# 00945

Previously owned Mustangs:
6F07C,5F07T,5F09A,6F08A,
5F07C,3F03F,1F03H,3F03H,
1F04F,3F01L,8F03Y,9F03W,
84 SVO,86 SVO
65fastback6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 05:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
datac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,934
Default

That's exactly what I did, still not a good time stressing about the paint. Probably just my perfectionist streak making life difficult (as usual).
__________________
datac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 06:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Milo Bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,514
Default

Thanks for all the tips. Doing both is an outstanding idea. Nick, let's chat.

Is there a shopping list for the brakes? All I see on cj pony is some pretty pictures. Cylinders, shoes, probably drums... but how to make sure I get all the right springs and stuff?
__________________
1965 convertible, 289 C-code upgraded to 4bbl
1965 coupe, 200, T5 - daily driver
Milo Bloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 11:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 10,018
Default

If you're going to do a thorough job plus a dual bowl conversion, then here is what I'd get/do....

Front Brake Flex Hoses
Front Wheel Cylinders
Front Brake Shoes (you'll need to measure shoe width and drum inside diameter)
Front Brake Hold-down Kit
Front Brake Return Spring Kit
Front Brake Self Adjuster Kit
Front Hub Grease Seals
Front Inner and Outer Wheel Bearings and Outer Races
Cotter Pins

Rear Brake Flex Hose
Rear Wheel Cylinders
Rear Brake Shoes (yep, measure these too as there are a couple sizes)
Rear Brake Hold Down Kit
Rear Brake Return Spring Kit
Rear Brake Self Adjuster Kit
Rear Parking Brake Cable (if yours are rusted/sticking)

When you have everything removed from the backing plates, I'd remove them and clean them thoroughly and make sure there is not excessive wear on the 3 raised pads where the sides of the brake shoes slide. If so, they can be built up with a MIG and ground down smooth. Prime and paint or powder coat and re-install. Clean up and paint/powder coat the Rear Brake Equalizer Bar and reinstall with the new spring that comes in the Return Spring Kit.

The drums will be stamped with a maximum diameter so based on their condition an automotive brake shop should know whether they can be machined or will need to be replaced. Regardless, I'd make sure new wheel studs are installed in either and in the rear axle flanges. They're cheap and they get stretched over time and can break.

Clean everything with Brakleen or denatured alcohol. Lubricate the wear pads on the backing plates, the anchor pin at the top of the backing plate, the self adjuster screw and swivel and the self adjuster cable guide with NevrSeize.

For a drum/drum master cylinder, use the '67 style dual-bowl master cylinder. You'll have to make up a short line to the distribution block and then branch from there to each front wheel, and connect the rear line directly to the M/C - you may need an adapter or short section of line.
__________________
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/signaturepics/sigpic19079_1.gif

6F09A 63A 8 26 09D 71 1 5
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 08:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 151
Default

Bart's list is on the money. Only thing I would stress is to get the best RIVETED brake shoes you can find. Stay with a national brand, i.e., Bendix, Wagner, Raybestos. Do NOT use bonded shoes. Avoid the less expensive "house brand" supposedly made by one of the major brands, if possible. Using cheap junk when doing a brake job insures that you will not like the stopping power. In the overall scheme of things, good quality brakes are an inexpensive way to protect you and your car.
Best,
Al
Al Newman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 08:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Milo Bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,514
Default

What's the word on "re-lined" shoes? I see some of those on Rock Auto and I don't like the sound of that.

The shop manual says I should have 9 x 2.25 in the front and 9 x 1.5 in the back. This thing was bone stock when I picked it up so I can't imagine it has anything else, but I'll check.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone.
__________________
1965 convertible, 289 C-code upgraded to 4bbl
1965 coupe, 200, T5 - daily driver
Milo Bloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 09:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodgestang View Post
You know I have some nice 5 leaf mid-eyes sitting in the garage...just need a new centering pin
The tall 64-66 tie bolt set is Glazier/Nolan G05144.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 09:52 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartl View Post
The drums will be stamped with a maximum diameter so based on their condition an automotive brake shop should know whether they can be machined or will need to be replaced.
Don't ask them to go past 0.060" oversize- That's the legal maximum.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.