New Rear Springs Incorrect Wheelbase ??? - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2012, 06:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Default New Rear Springs Incorrect Wheelbase ???

Ok so I new here and just wanted to run this by any one?

I bought some new rear springs from NPD the other day and installed them on my 1966 Mustang Fastback after installing them correctly I notice the rear tires seem to be real close to the front of the rear wheel opening not centered like the were with the old springs. So I looked up the spec. on the wheelbase for the mustang and found it is to measure 108 inches. I measured the wheelbase with the new springs measured 107 ½ inch. I checked to make sure the axle was seated in the bolt that bolts the spring together it was. Has new rear shackles. Any help and has any one run into this before. Oh ya the springs are the GT ones listed in the NPD catalog I guess the lower the car ½ inch.Thanks for the help!!
greenn50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-29-2012, 07:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Harleydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Livingston, New York
Posts: 925
Default

Do you still have the old springs? Measure them and compare.
__________________
68 Fastback. 351W/Toploader
Harleydave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 08:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
madstang78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 248
Default

Loosen the I-bolts and rear shackle bolts. Put car on ground and bounce the rear end a few times by standing on bumper or something. That will get the springs and bushings to settle. If you have door jack up the rear with a floor jack and drop it to the ground a few times. Then measure and tighten the bolts With the suspension loaded
__________________
67 coupe 289 2bl, c4, 34k. That's how I got it but a lot has changed.
madstang78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 12:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Default

I have the old spring and try to measure them the best i could but i will have to take the u bolts off to get a better measurement.

Good point didn't think about that i tighten everything hanging in the air.
greenn50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 12:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockton, Nor-Cal
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenn50 View Post
I have the old spring and try to measure them the best i could but i will have to take the u bolts off to get a better measurement.

Good point didn't think about that i tighten everything hanging in the air.
are they on the right way? if they are backwards, you would get a shorter wheel base. just a thought.
slotracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cmefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bonney Lake, Wa
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotracer View Post
are they on the right way? if they are backwards, you would get a shorter wheel base. just a thought.
That would not be possible.
cmefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Maxum96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 5,191
Default

Look at any vintage Mustang. The rear wheels sit closer to the front of the wheel well than the rear.
__________________
1970 Fastback (to be finished outside as a Boss 302 clone)
393 Windsor AFR 205 heads with 11.5:1 compression
Tremec TKO 5 Speed
Link to my Hub Garage and blog about my car http://www.hubgarage.com/mygarage/maxum96



Maxum96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cmefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bonney Lake, Wa
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenn50 View Post
Ok so I new here and just wanted to run this by any one?

I bought some new rear springs from NPD the other day and installed them on my 1966 Mustang Fastback after installing them correctly I notice the rear tires seem to be real close to the front of the rear wheel opening not centered like the were with the old springs. So I looked up the spec. on the wheelbase for the mustang and found it is to measure 108 inches. I measured the wheelbase with the new springs measured 107 ½ inch. I checked to make sure the axle was seated in the bolt that bolts the spring together it was. Has new rear shackles. Any help and has any one run into this before. Oh ya the springs are the GT ones listed in the NPD catalog I guess the lower the car ½ inch.Thanks for the help!!
The 65/66 mustang leaf springs should measure 22" from the center of both the front bushing and the center pin and 31" from center of the rear bushing to the pin. I do see a lot of venders that list leaf springs for 65-73 mustangs as the same and they are not. the 67-73 spring is the same 53" in length but the center pin is moved forward 1/8" to 21 7/8" and 31 1/8". Also make sure the housing is pushed back as far as it can go on the centering pin on the leaf. I just did a 9" housing with new mustang springs in a Falcon and I was able to pick up an extra 1/8" pushing the housing as far back as it would go. Not sure on a stock housing if there is much to gain, but on early falcons and comets that 1/8 is nice to have if trying to run a little taller tire.

Last edited by cmefly; 12-01-2012 at 01:22 PM.
cmefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockton, Nor-Cal
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmefly View Post
That would not be possible.
just a thought, I have seen some things you would think were not possible, like I tell my Carpenters, never say never!
slotracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cmefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bonney Lake, Wa
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotracer View Post
just a thought, I have seen some things you would think were not possible, like I tell my Carpenters, never say never!
I know what you are saying, It is crazy what people will do.
cmefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
blkfrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 2,361
Default

Don't get too hung up on the 108" wheelbase. Your current problem may be very real, but the wheelbase difference your seeing can be due to one or a combination of several things that are not a problem
__________________
Tracy Blackford
Anaheim, CA
65 Mustang FB, 331 custom built with 289 H beam rods and 383W piston, 282S cam, self ported '70 351w heads, Dougs Tri-Y headers. 1.7 shaft rockers and 26986 beehives. Hurricane Single Plane and custom 750 HP. T5z and 3.50 9" posi rear.
430 HP @ 6500...not too shabby for old school heads!


'65 Fastback
blkfrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 07:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Default

Ok problem solved I loosened the u bolts and took two ratchet straps on each side pulled the axle toward the back of the car and tightened the u-bolts. Now the wheel base measures 107 7/8 on both sides. I figuring that that is close enough for my liking. Thanks for the help!!
greenn50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.