1965 fender mounted brake proportioning valve necessary? - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2012, 11:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
HoosierBuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Probably in the garage
Posts: 6,266
Default 1965 fender mounted brake proportioning valve necessary?

Hey guys,

My 1965 is equipped with a 1967 dual reservoir master cylinder. It's got the stock drums in back and Wilwood disks in front.

The way the brake lines run now is:

1. The line for the rear brakes comes off the master cylinder, runs to an adjustable wilwood proportioning valve and then heads under the car towards the back where it tees and goes to each rear drum.

2. The line for the front brakes goes to the stock proportioning valve mounted to the fender (that has the rear brake port plugged) and 2 lines leave that block, one to the left front brake and one to the right front brake.

While replacing the line from the master cylinder to the stock, fender mounted, proportioning valve block, I stripped the threads inside the darn brass proportioning valve.

I ordered a replacement from NPD....but the question occurs to me:

Do I even need the darn thing? Wouldn't an inline tee serve the same purpose since I'm handling the front/rear bias through the aftermarket proportioning valve.

Thoughts?

Phil
__________________


"Two barks means faster!" Enzo
HoosierBuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mjb1032's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southeast, MA
Posts: 1,168
Default

The car probably only had a distribution block, so they added the in-line proportioning valve.
Here's a pic of my 68's distribution block (which also contains a pressure switch)...


If this is what you have, there's no proportioning provision.
You still need to add one. A tee can't limit pressure, which is what keeps the rears from locking up before the fronts.
__________________
Slowly restoring and improving dads '68 289 Coupe...

Last edited by mjb1032; 12-20-2012 at 12:21 PM.
mjb1032 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 12:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 14,618
Default

The original 65/66 had the single compartment master so there was no distribution block. If the car came with front disc brakes from the factory it would have had a proportioning valve.

When the 67 master and disc fronts were added the person doing the mod would know if you are observing a distribution block or a combination dist and prop valve is what you have. A pic would help.


Slim
__________________


My '64 1/2 vert. Ordered May '64. D code 4 speed, handling package, caspian blue, accent group, Ford blue manual top.

'68 vert. driver. Owned since '77. C code AT, AC, PS, P disc B, PT lime gold, standard black interior and top. NOS RF fender and left quarter.New top and folding glass.
slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 12:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 178
Default

you are already bypassing the DB for the rears so thats not an issue. I would think that you could replace the DB with a tee for the fronts but IMO I would reroute the rears through the db and put the PV inline after the DB block and then you can wire you brake warning light back up. with the rears bypassing the DB the warning light should be on constantly.
__________________

merfsiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 01:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierBuddy View Post
Hey guys,

My 1965 is equipped with a 1967 dual reservoir master cylinder. It's got the stock drums in back and Wilwood disks in front.

The way the brake lines run now is:

1. The line for the rear brakes comes off the master cylinder, runs to an adjustable wilwood proportioning valve and then heads under the car towards the back where it tees and goes to each rear drum.

2. The line for the front brakes goes to the stock proportioning valve mounted to the fender (that has the rear brake port plugged) and 2 lines leave that block, one to the left front brake and one to the right front brake.

While replacing the line from the master cylinder to the stock, fender mounted, proportioning valve block, I stripped the threads inside the darn brass proportioning valve.

I ordered a replacement from NPD....but the question occurs to me:

Do I even need the darn thing? Wouldn't an inline tee serve the same purpose since I'm handling the front/rear bias through the aftermarket proportioning valve.

Thoughts?

Phil
You got it.

The brass block is nothing more than a T--Nothing more, No proportioning at all.

My only question is, Which port of master goes to which end??

Front port always to rears, Rear port of Master to Front.

Dan @ Chockostang
CHOCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 01:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 39
Default

My '66 with 4-wheel drum brakes and a single bowl master cylinder had a distribution block. If you have a proportioning valve to the rear brakes as you stated and you have a distribution block like the one in the attached picture, the answer to your question is yes: a tee fitting will accomplish the same function as the distribution block with the port for the rear brakes plugged.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Suspension - Brakes 2009 066.jpg (88.5 KB, 20 views)
1966ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 02:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
HoosierBuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Probably in the garage
Posts: 6,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1966ford View Post
My '66 with 4-wheel drum brakes and a single bowl master cylinder had a distribution block. If you have a proportioning valve to the rear brakes as you stated and you have a distribution block like the one in the attached picture, the answer to your question is yes: a tee fitting will accomplish the same function as the distribution block with the port for the rear brakes plugged.
Yes. That's exactly what I have.

FWIW...response to earlier poster...the 1965 doesn't have a brake warning light.

AND...I misspoke earlier. The part I ordered from NPD is called, "DISTRIBUTION BLOCK EXACT REPRO MOUNTS TO INNER FENDER APRON BY MASTER CYLINDER"

Thanks for everyone's help!

Phil
__________________


"Two barks means faster!" Enzo
HoosierBuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.