Best Motor Mounts For A Daily Driven '65 W/289 - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2013, 06:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,731
Send a message via ICQ to 73GrandStang Send a message via AIM to 73GrandStang Send a message via Yahoo to 73GrandStang
Default Best Motor Mounts For A Daily Driven '65 W/289

Hello everyone,
As my subject line states, I'm looking for the best motor mounts for a daily driven '65 with a 289. I looked at my oil pan from a distance and my motor is definitely not sitting evenly.

I was looking at the different polyurethane ones, but I don't even know if they're worth the extra cost. I have been having fun since the rebuild, so maybe I need some beefier ones.

Any suggestions?
__________________
-Art Nunez
One Man, Four Mustangs


Natalie- My 1973 Mustang Grande (351C-2v-C4 Trans)
The Geezer- My 1972 Mustang Grande (302-2v- FMX Trans)
Ana (Banana)- My 1965 C-Code Coupe (289-2v- C4 Trans)
Cerberus (The Beast) - My Ugly 1973 Mustang Grande (351C-2v- FMX Trans)
73GrandStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-17-2013, 08:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dalorzof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,565
Default

OEM style, usually last a few decades and bolt right in?
__________________
"True terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country."
Kurt Vonnegut


8R03S : 76A I 2A 15M 72 5 U
8R01S : 65A B 2A 28M 72 7 5 - Factory GT
8R01C : 65A M 2A 01E 72 2 W - CS/GT
8F01X : 65A I 2G 20E 24 1 U - EXP500 to-be

dalorzof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
ravenblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 71
Default

I would get the OEM mounts. What I did with mine was to drill through the mounts on either side of the stud and run bolts through them. I think I used 5/16" grade 5 bolts in mine. The reasoning behind that is because the rubber part of the mount is just bonded to the steel part and they tend to break there fairly easily in my experience. You can probably get away with just doing that to the driver's side mount.
__________________
64 1/2 Raven Black Coupe
D code 289
C4 auto
3.00:1 open rear

Resto redo
ravenblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,547
Default

In the replacement process, you may want to convert to the later '66 type. For a driver, I would stick with the original type, although the '66 design is much better.
__________________
SWMBO's '66 Coupe 289, 2-V, C-4(Pony Interior, Rally Pac, A/C & Tiffany Stripe) & An absolutely rust free '65 289-2V C-4 coupe project now UPGRADED to about 93.891% complete. Only a few more years.
Gas_Pumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: near Austin, TX
Posts: 3,840
Default

Ron Morris mounts are not solid, but ARE much more rigid than the stock mounts. I used them for many years on a previous car and was completely satisfied. I will be putting a new set of them on my current K code as soon as possible.

ronmorrisperformance.com RMP Adjustable Motor Mounts

ron morris performance

Z.
__________________
'65 HiPo fastback
zray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 11:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
tx65coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,414
Default

I'm using the RMP mounts too. I would recommend them.
__________________
1997 Cobra Convertible (stock)
1965 Mustang
Late Model 302 and T5 and Versailles 9 Inch
Edelbrock Heads, Cam, Intake, and Carb
JBA Headers and Dynomax Ultraflo Mufflers
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/me...-100-1108.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXk_MVV7V0g
tx65coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 02:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,256
Thumbup

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenblack View Post
I would get the OEM mounts. What I did with mine was to drill through the mounts on either side of the stud and run bolts through them. I think I used 5/16" grade 5 bolts in mine. The reasoning behind that is because the rubber part of the mount is just bonded to the steel part and they tend to break there fairly easily in my experience. You can probably get away with just doing that to the driver's side mount.
+1 on that
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Bolted Mounts1.jpg (57.8 KB, 37 views)
__________________
As the drill sergeant said, "I taught you everything you know. I didn't teach you everything I know."

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
GT289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 06:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
65since88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central,Pa
Posts: 903
Default

I have the Prothane 66 Style mounts they are nice and will probably outlast stock. Downside is imo they are stiffer and with an aggressive camshaft I think the car rocks more looking down the fenders at idle seem to move similar to solid mounts.
__________________

Kevin
1965 Fastback-Scat 331, Dart heads, FPA headers, Air Gap intake, 650 Ultra DP, Cobra pan, Lunati VooDoo cam 61003, C-4, 10 inch converter, Reverse manual valve body,Detroit Truetracw/3.50s, subframe connectors.
1968 S-code Torino Fastback= project
1966 A-code Mustang coupe=Basket case not sure what to do with it used some parts for the fastback.
65since88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 07:17 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
LastDeadLast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tx65coupe View Post
I'm using the RMP mounts too. I would recommend them.
+1. I love them.

-Shannon
__________________
1965 Mustang convertible

331 Stroker with EFI, 355rwhp - 358 ft/lbs
Street or Track coil-over suspension

LastDeadLast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 07:28 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GT289 View Post
+1 on that
+2 you can't get any cheaper
__________________
Z06killinsbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 07:31 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,696
Default

OEM
__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 09:15 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenblack View Post
I would get the OEM mounts. What I did with mine was to drill through the mounts on either side of the stud and run bolts through them. I think I used 5/16" grade 5 bolts in mine. The reasoning behind that is because the rubber part of the mount is just bonded to the steel part and they tend to break there fairly easily in my experience. You can probably get away with just doing that to the driver's side mount.
It's an old racer's trick, but works extremely well. Might cost you $3 and an hour or two, they'll never fail.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 11:01 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
daniels1414's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 108
Default

If you do any spirited driving or track or drag I would not recommend oem unless you use the bolt trick. After splitting about three sets at the track I switched to ron morris and have never had a problem since. They are a little pricey so the bolt trick might be a good option if price is an issue. My 1 cent. Good luck
__________________
67 Fastback. Modified 289 with paxton.
daniels1414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 12:00 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,731
Send a message via ICQ to 73GrandStang Send a message via AIM to 73GrandStang Send a message via Yahoo to 73GrandStang
Default

$225 for motor mounts?!? Wow!

Yeah, I do some spirited driving, but not $225 worth of it. LOL

I'm gonna go with the bolt trick. Thanks guys!
__________________
-Art Nunez
One Man, Four Mustangs


Natalie- My 1973 Mustang Grande (351C-2v-C4 Trans)
The Geezer- My 1972 Mustang Grande (302-2v- FMX Trans)
Ana (Banana)- My 1965 C-Code Coupe (289-2v- C4 Trans)
Cerberus (The Beast) - My Ugly 1973 Mustang Grande (351C-2v- FMX Trans)
73GrandStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 12:04 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,696
Default

aren't the Lakewood Muscle Mounts supposed to be interlocking internally? i had a set, they pretty much looked like stock on the outside and weren't very expensive if i remember right ($25/ea?).
__________________
Dearborn, March 31, 1969
buckeyedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.