Can't find backing plates for 10" x 2.5" rear drum upgrade - Page 2 - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2013, 09:17 AM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

That was my understanding, thus the search for 2.5" rear drums.
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-28-2013, 10:40 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartl View Post
You might want to try or call these guys-----although they're discontinued they might have stock...

https://www.silverstatefordparts.com...ord-parts.html
Apparently they do have them available.... for under $120.
__________________
As the drill sergeant said, "I taught you everything you know. I didn't teach you everything I know."

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
GT289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 01:56 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 614
Default

These are the type I used:
1995 Ford Ranger Stock Rearend Backing Plates for 8 8 Big Brakes | eBay
1994 Ford Ranger Stock Rearend Backing Plates for 7 5 Big Brakes | eBay

Like I said, they have to be modified to fit, and you should order your parts for a 94/95 Ranger.

Joe
__________________
1965 Mercury Comet Hardtop
289/Autolite 4100/4spd Toploader
jmd66fb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 01:02 AM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

Nice finds guys! For $120 for the pair I ordered the new service parts. The applications for the parts all said the product was obsolete but the site let me order - we'll see what happens. Looks like rockauto.com has everything else I'll need super cheap! Thanks again!
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 08:25 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

Well drat, Silver State Ford only had one side - and asked for $90 for that! Back to junkyard/eBay diving. I found a yard in Nebraska that is going to check out a possible set for me tomorrow if it doesn't snow too much. If that fails, it's Ranger time.
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 01:18 AM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 614
Default

This seller has done all the footwork:
Mustang Falcon Fairlane 10x2 1 2" Conversion Backing Plates Pads Hardware Kit | eBay

Price aint too bad.

Joe
__________________
1965 Mercury Comet Hardtop
289/Autolite 4100/4spd Toploader
jmd66fb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 11:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

Good stuff - but just found '85 Town Car backing plates today at a salvage yard in Nebraska via car-part.com. Not bad at $35 apiece and $15 total for shipping. I'll have to see condition when they arrive. Will I need the indexing rings? If so, found a source here for only $20 for the pair. Rockauto looks to have all the various hardware bits for cheap - I will post a total once I have everything. Certainly does look like a good way to save a lot of time and hassle chasing items though - I may well have gone that way if I hadn't already ordered backing plates (and could yet if they don't pan out for some reason). Thanks again for the info - the combined knowledge and Internet perusing of this crew is an impressive thing.
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 01:45 AM   #23 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

Anybody know the difference between FMSI 169 (brake shoe for classic 10"x2.5") and FMSI 481 (newer 10"x2.5" brake shoe)? I can find Porterfield RS-4 shoes for 169 but not 481. My guess (which I don't trust) is that if I use the older drum hardware I could use 169 and newer hardware for 481 but I really don't know and can't find specs/dimensions.
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 06:41 AM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65 Fastback View Post
That was my understanding, thus the search for 2.5" rear drums.
Glazier/Nolan lists the 65-67 2½" rear drum as G03323.
__________________
Amateur restorer. (Well, once in a while I have been paid for it)
22GT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 09:43 AM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: near Austin, TX
Posts: 3,833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65 Fastback View Post
Anybody know the difference between FMSI 169 (brake shoe for classic 10"x2.5") and FMSI 481 (newer 10"x2.5" brake shoe)? I can find Porterfield RS-4 shoes for 169 but not 481. My guess (which I don't trust) is that if I use the older drum hardware I could use 169 and newer hardware for 481 but I really don't know and can't find specs/dimensions.
not why call the Porterfield folks. In my experience they have always been very helpful.


Z.
__________________
'65 HiPo fastback
zray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 10:01 AM   #26 (permalink)
Member
 
65 Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 74
Default

I shot them a note last night, we'll see what they have to say.
65 Fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 10:53 AM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 3,011
Default

Not surprised you can't find anything at your local salvage yard. Junk yards are getting kind of absurd these days. Apparently, about 10 years ago, when steel prices were very high, a lot of yards crushed everything they had and sold it as scrap. Now, when I go to a salvage yard, they want to sell me new parts. No thanks!
Klutch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 01:21 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65 Fastback View Post
Anybody know the difference between FMSI 169 (brake shoe for classic 10"x2.5") and FMSI 481 (newer 10"x2.5" brake shoe)? I can find Porterfield RS-4 shoes for 169 but not 481. My guess (which I don't trust) is that if I use the older drum hardware I could use 169 and newer hardware for 481 but I really don't know and can't find specs/dimensions.
This is from the Friction Materials Standards Institute book.
They are similar but not the same. The brake shoe hardware
kits are not the same part number either........
Attached Images
File Type: jpg shoe scan0001.jpg (88.8 KB, 10 views)
__________________
As the drill sergeant said, "I taught you everything you know. I didn't teach you everything I know."

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
GT289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 03:47 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 9,995
Default

Having done a few of these previously..... note 22GT's post that GN has the original style drums. These will fit your axle flange properly. If you use late model drums you will have to (well, should) use a spacer between the axle flange centering knob and the drum as the drum diameter is larger by about 1/4" all the way around. This is important if you're using hub-centric wheels, because you need a thin ring that does not protrude out past the drum face.
__________________
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/signaturepics/sigpic19079_1.gif

6F09A 63A 8 26 09D 71 1 5
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 05:01 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GT289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,247
Default

I agree that that is the right way to do things. While waiting for the
lathe to free up so I could make the spacers, I drove mine for a few
weeks without. I discovered that the factory drums are a really
close-tolerence fit on the wheel studs, so it's not a huge issue.....
I don't know about aftermarket drums, might be a looser fit.
__________________
As the drill sergeant said, "I taught you everything you know. I didn't teach you everything I know."

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
GT289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.