GT40 heads: Are they worth it? - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2013, 09:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 129
Default GT40 heads: Are they worth it?

I've got a '95 5.0 in my stang, running an edelbrock rpm intake and Holley 600 carburetor.

All this is in my '66 mustang dressed up to look like an old 289. I dynoed the car and it put down 240 hp and 290ft/lb of torque to the wheels on a lean a/f ratio and stock rockers. Since then I upped the timing, went up a few jet sizes and added 1.7 ratio roller rockers from crane.

Let's say this is good for... 265 hp?

Anyways, are the gt40 heads worth going to the trouble of putting on? Ideally I'd like to get 300 hp to the wheel without touching the cam. What should I pay for used heads? What should I have done to them while they're off? As is the car is very quick with the t-5 and 3.80 gears, but of course more power is nice! And 300 is a nice round number
happystang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-24-2013, 09:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
My67Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77
Default

Of topic but can you post pics. Curious how it looks disguised as an old 289.
__________________
1967 Mustang Coupe
289 V8 4bbl auto
My67Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 183
Default

If your running E7 heads GT40s are a good move. Whats the lift on your cam

Last edited by turbo2256b; 02-24-2013 at 10:04 PM.
turbo2256b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 213
Default

I don't think so unless you want to shave them down a bit. You will lose compression and negate a lot of the gain of the extra flow. Now if you get them shaved down you can make more power but you will have to take the intake in t o match them up.

Fast
Fastlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
wheelsup351's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 619
Default

I think they're worth it. They aren't 60rwhp bolt ons on your setup. I've seen them used anywhere from 400 to 700. All depends who the seller is and what condition they are in. If they need a lot of work you might be out the price of a decent set of alum heads.

Gt40 heads are very good heads in many applications and they generally crap on e7s
__________________
Jason, traps 126 @ 3400# all motor

wheelsup351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 213
Default

Oh wait I did not see the 5.0 part. Yeah it would increase hp but you should think about changing out that cam for real change
Fastlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 105
Default

im hoping to find some gt40 heads, not gt40p as they seem to need special headers to fit in vintage mustangs.
__________________
1968 Coupe - currently I6 3spd, restomod underway.
2004 Forester XT - DD and parts hauler
2009 Cobalt SS - 330whp 370wtrq - 32mpg -Track Star

"Love your enemies, it will drive them crazy"
Baron7700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 622
Default

You could shave them a bit to up the compression ratio - stock 5.0 is 9.0:1
Reverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 10:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 183
Default

’93 Mustang Cobra…….......F3ZE-AA…………….....60-63cc
’94-’95 Mustang Cobra……..F4ZE-AA………….......60-63cc
’96-97 Explorer………………...F1ZE-AA………….......63-66cc

Think this is correct
turbo2256b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 11:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by My67Coupe View Post
Of topic but can you post pics. Curious how it looks disguised as an old 289.
In this photo it had a performer 289 manifold and edelbrock carb. Ditched both of those for a rpm intake and Holley 600.

I currently have the E7 heads, how much would a machine shop charge to mill the gt40 heads down a bit to bump up the compression? Wouldn't I have valve clearance issues and have to change the push rod length?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 548762_10151201541759231_423351458_n.jpg (91.0 KB, 47 views)
happystang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 12:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bartl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Rutland, Vermont, USA
Posts: 10,068
Default

I've seen some flow number showing the E7's flowing in stock form a little better at lower valve lifts, like .200-.300 and, with some porting, E7's flowing as well as stock GT-40's. Maybe you could try working over your E7's first. If you're not satisfied you can do the switch to the GT-40's. As far as the milling is concerned I don't think you'll need to as the GT-40's combustion chamber is about the same size as the E7TE but if you did it would depend on how the valvetrain geometry lines up. You can use shims under some of the "bolt on" roller rockers out there.
__________________
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/signaturepics/sigpic19079_1.gif

6F09A 63A 8 26 09D 71 1 5
bartl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 09:48 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Renegade600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mosinee, WI
Posts: 1,088
Default

GT-40 are a good bang for the buck... have the heads skimmed off some, clean up the exhaust ports, use your 1.7 rockers, and run the wheels off it....I would look for some F3ZE-AA heads from '93 as they will have the smallest chamber....I have (2) sets and both work out to be about 60cc..... the later ones seem to always have more volumn...
Tom
__________________


'69 Coupe, Built 306, 4-Speed, Matte Black..... Old School RestoMod...Coming Attractions: 408 Stroker...
'90 Mustang LX, Built 306, 5-speed, cage, Screaming Yellow....3/14/12 Currently Getting TWIN TURBOS (always a change to make).....
1938 Cough,cough, Chev. 1/2 ton Owner built "Street Gasser" truck..327, 461X, Hillborn...old school all the way...
A Custom HD RoadKing...and too many Vintage Sleds to count...
Renegade600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:09 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 183
Default

E7 heads are 64cc give or take tollerance. The lightning truck heas would also have the smaller chambers.
Max differance of 2cc or even 6cc dosent realy change much in a low compression engine such as 9 to 1. Now if were a 12 to 1 compression it would be a big change.
turbo2256b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:29 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 183
Default

E7 heads flow about 145 CFM at .400 lift so do most small port Ford heads.
The GT40s flow about 185 CFM at .400 lift
At .500 lift most SBF small ports max 160 to 150 cfm. The GT40s around 190.

A performer RPM intakes flow maxes out around an average of good port bad port 167 CFM.
So at .4 lift you could see an increase of as much as 40 HP if all else is matched up and tuned properly
turbo2256b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 11:57 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 4,692
Default

They sell rocker arm shims to go on the pedestals if you shave the heads. Shave it .030, use .030 shims as an example.
__________________
1995 GT convertible - Laser Red
1995 GT convertible - Black (Son's ride)
1966 GT Fastback under restoration- Code T Red
with White LeMans stripes.
ScottsGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.