68 Shelby GT-350 J-code - Vintage Mustang Forums
Vintage Mustang Forum
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Go Back   Vintage Mustang Forums > General Discussion > Vintage Mustang Forum
Vintage-Mustang.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2013, 06:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default 68 Shelby GT-350 J-code

Hi Guys,

What is the going price on these? are they rare find? How is it compares to 67 K-code mustang (price wise & collector wise)?

Cheers,
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-08-2013, 06:31 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,935
Default

The 67 K code Mustang is more rare than either the 67 or 68 GT 350. In a fair comparison, the GT 350 probably still has the edge in price, though. As always, condition is the single most important factor.
__________________
Amateur restorer. Well, sometimes I have been paid for it. But not right now.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 06:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default

How much the 68 350 goes with reasonably good condition with AC/PS ?
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 07:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dalorzof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,107
Default

Clean and correct, fastback ~$70k, convertible ~$80k Both +/- $10k as a ballpark.

Solid projects $45-60k.

All dependant on condition and what's missing.

Believe PS was standard, AC optional. AC might add a bit, but not much.
__________________
"True terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country."
Kurt Vonnegut


8R03S : 76A I 2A 15M 72 5 U
8R01S : 65A B 2A 28M 72 7 5 - Factory GT
8R01C : 65A M 2A 01E 72 2 W - CS/GT
8F01X : 65A I 2G 20E 24 1 U - EXP500 to-be

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h1...pr_07_tiny.jpg
dalorzof is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 03:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default

Thanks dalorzof,

Any ideas for the K code mustang pricing?

If you have a choice which one you choose? k code or 68 gt 350?
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 03:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
caveeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St Charles, IL
Posts: 1,322
Default

I would take a '67 K over the '68 any day of the week. (w comperable price/condition)

Keep in mind:

>'67 was the last year for the K
>'67 was the last year Shelby actuall built the cars. (early shelby mustangs)
>All '67 GT350s were K codes
>Because of the introduction of the 390 'thunderbird' engine, the K option was pretty rare.
__________________
mark
----------------------------
04 SVT Cobra, Torch Red (daily driver)
67 'vert 302,4spd,Red/Red (almost ready!)
67 Coupe 289,auto,black/black,deluxe (sold)
67 Coupe I6 to V8 conversion (sold)
caveeagle is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 04:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default

caveeagle, so 67k code mustang more collectible than 68 shelby 350?
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 04:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,197
Default

Collectible and valuable are two different things... But that said, a similarly-restored 67 K-code would probably bring about as much as a similarly-restored 68 GT350

A similarly-restored 67 GT350 would bring yet more money, as they're in stronger demand, even though the rarity-nod goes to the 67 K non-Shelby.

The 1968 GT350 does not pull as much value as the 1967 GT350 because the J-code 302 was not much of a runner, and that's putting it as politely as possible. Ford fixed that issue in 1969 with the introduction of the 351 Windsor...

I agree with dalorzof's value estimates for restored cars, assuming the restorations really are top-drawer, but I think good projects could be found for less (maybe not for the convertible, but for the fastback).
69bossnine is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 04:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69bossnine View Post
The 1968 GT350 does not pull as much value as the 1967 GT350 because the J-code 302 was not much of a runner, and that's putting it as politely as possible.
You are being kind. The 68 GT350 is the weak sister of the Shelby pantheon. Based on the J-code GT, the engine was basically the 68 version of the 65-67 A code 289 4V. Like it's predecessor, the J code had the same camshaft and exhaust manifolds as the 289 2V, with only a set of flat-top pistons and a pretty small 4300 4V carb to improve performance. The 68 GT350 was supposed to get the 715 cfm Holley on a Cobra intake (major overkill on this very mild engine) but it was not government approved for emissions, so early cars were stone-stock J-codes. They were supposed to be retrofittted by dealers when later approved, but some owners never bothered.

After seeing 65-67 GT350 with the High Performance 289, the J code 68 GT350 was a major disappointment.

About the best thing you can do with a 68 GT350 is fit a C9OZ-6250-C camshaft and a set of 289HP exhaust manifolds. Really transforms the car, and very subtle.
__________________
Amateur restorer. Well, sometimes I have been paid for it. But not right now.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 04:52 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default

So k-code 289 puts more power than the 68 350?
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 04:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pakoris View Post
So k-code 289 puts more power than the 68 350?
Gobs.
__________________
Amateur restorer. Well, sometimes I have been paid for it. But not right now.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-08-2013, 08:45 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 18,391
Default

Forget Shelby for a minute. 65-67 standard 289 4V was A code about 225 @ 4800 rpm hydraulic lifter. 68 the A code was replaced by J code 302 4V about 230 @ 4800 rpm hydraulic lifter. 65-67 289 4V hi perf K code 270 Hp @ 6000 rpm solid lifters. K code was dropped for 68 only performance engines were big block. Marketing had announced a hi perf 302 for 68 sorta like the K code (sorta, don't flame me...) the Boss 302 was coming in 69. IMO the J code was a one year orphan and a higher perf one never made it to production.

The 68 no matter the model, including Shelby stood alone with no high perf small block!



Slim
__________________
My '64 1/2 vert. Ordered May '64. D code 4 speed, handling package, caspian blue, accent group, Ford blue manual top.

'68 vert. driver. Owned since '77. C code AT, AC, PS, P disc B, PT lime gold, standard black interior and top. NOS RF fender and left quarter.New top and folding glass.

Last edited by slim; 04-08-2013 at 08:48 PM.
slim is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-09-2013, 01:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Default

Thanks, just for my understanding. The 67 s-code is cheaper than 67 k-code right?
pakoris is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-09-2013, 02:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Senior Member
 
supershifter2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Frum Hear Two Their Eventually
Posts: 7,283
Default

67 hipo 289 will blow the doors off the 68 gt350 lackluster 302. 68 gt350 is the slowest of all shelbys and early performance mustnags. 68gt350 was suppose to get a detuned 302 tp engine but the tp heads were a disaster on the track and the plan was scrapped and a plain old 302 with 4v carb went in.
__________________
supershifter2 < !
supershifter2 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-09-2013, 06:40 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
22GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pakoris View Post
Thanks, just for my understanding. The 67 s-code is cheaper than 67 k-code right?
Usually. The The 67 K code included only a couple hundred cars, while the S code was built by the thousands.
__________________
Amateur restorer. Well, sometimes I have been paid for it. But not right now.
22GT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.