Pickup Beds - Vintage Mustang Forums
 9Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-18-2019, 12:37 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Abilene, Tx
Posts: 30
Pickup Beds

Who asked for beds so tall you can only access them through the tailgate?
I bought an ‘07 Canyon and the bed is just a little above belly button high. I can see into it, reach stuff, and actually put things in from the side.
Guess we are to blame, we bought them when they went “two story.”
Woossh48 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-18-2019, 07:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: DFW
Posts: 361
Yeah I know. Trucks aren't built for the jobsite anymore they are built for the people that want a big car. Even the small trucks are pretty tall. It's also part of why you are seeing more vans for commercial use along with in a van your stuff doesn't get wet or stolen and you can carry longer material and all inside...

I finally saw a canyon the other day and it's a nice little truck, diesel black nice headache rack etc but cost as much as a full size which is part of why they are not big sellers here. I still haven't seen a new Ranger in the wild yet, I guess they aren't being sold yet.
elcam84 is online now  
post #3 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-18-2019, 09:28 PM
Senior Member
 
myfirstcar66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Auburn University, Alabama
Posts: 1,290
Garage
I've seen a few Rangers on the road and at the dealer. I'm a Ford guy for the greatest part, but the new Ranger looks like an F-150 mated with a Tacoma. And they're as expensive as an F-150. I'm obviously not the target audience. I have an F-250, and I am a tall person so I like the build of the truck but it's obvious the body of trucks has gotten taller over the years, nevermind the suspension height.

My 1st car...
'66 Tahoe Turquoise/ Aqua coupe
•289 / 4100 •C4 Auto •Disc Brakes
•Dual Exhaust •Quick Manual Steering
•Rally Pac •Console •Deluxe Belts
•LOTS of Rotunda accessories

Older son's 1st car...
'66 Emberglo / Parchment deluxe coupe
•289 / 2100 •C4 Auto
•Dealer A/C • Console
•Dual Exhaust • Power Steering

Younger son's 1st car...
'66 Nightmist / Blue & white deluxe coupe
•289 / 2100 •C4 Auto
•Factory A/C •Console
WAITING FOR RESTORATION

myfirstcar66 is offline  
 
post #4 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 06:28 AM
Senior Member
 
bmcgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,072
The same people who decided that truck buyers only want 1/2 a truck.

In a full size truck, if I cant put a sheet of plywood in the bed and close the tailgate, its not a truck, its a SUV made to look like a truck.

If I want 1/2 a truck, I will buy a Tacoma.
gwstang, Rufus68 and myfirstcar66 like this.


1965 Mustang Coupe 289/C4
1967 Mustang Coupe 200/C4
2017 Mustang EB Premium
bmcgc is offline  
post #5 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 08:19 AM
Senior Member
 
65 Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 4,226
The 99-07 classic Silverados were the last full size GM truck you could reach over on the 2wd models.

I have a 2015 Z71 and it has a bumper step on the rear. At 5'8", I have to get on my toes to reach the dipstick. I miss my old 2000, that was the last time full size trucks were the "right size".


Government regulations and crash tests also share some of the blame, to meet crash tests they had to raise belt lines (this is a lot more obvious on newer cars) and I guess to make them still look like how we're used to seeing them, they raised the beds to go with the belt lines.

2011 Mustang 3.7L Premium Pony Package
2015 Silverado 5.3L 2LT DC Z71
1965 Mustang C Code Coupe 289/T5/3.25
1967 Chevrolet C10 350/700R/3.73
1968 Pontiac Firebird 400

Last edited by 65 Pony; 08-19-2019 at 08:34 AM.
65 Pony is offline  
post #6 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 08:22 AM
Senior Member
 
Huntingky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 3,032
Yep, the bed on my 2012 F150 SCREW a pain to get stuff in and out of. Yeah, maybe half car, half truck, but fills my needs for a single vehicle that I can carry lots of family members and still load the bed down with ATV, dead deer, or big load of corn, fertilizer etc. If I was doing construction or such, I would prefer a full 8 ft bed and something lower.

Coyote build in 65 GT Fastback in body work https://forums.vintage-mustang.com/b...e-powered.html and on Facebook @65gtmustang
F150 SCREW Ecoboost as my daily
66 Emberglow Coupe first car,71 Torino GT, 82 Fastback slooooow 6 banger, 71 Boss 351, 85 GT all long gone
Huntingky is offline  
post #7 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 03:14 PM
Senior Member
 
MikeG69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,683
Garage
I am very happy with my 2000 Ranger 4x4. I priced out a new Ranger & OMG are they expensive. Everything I need to carry I can fit in my Ranger, if I need to carry a sheet of plywood slid it down in the front of the bed & out over the top of the tail gate, works great. I can still get stuff out of or into the bed over the side also.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_1160.jpg (488.4 KB, 3 views)
gwstang and myfirstcar66 like this.

2000 Ranger 4X4 (my DD)
1999 Explorer Sport (wife's DD)
2008 Escape (spare)
1969 Mustang Coupe (project)
2014 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom (wife's toy)
Build thread; http://www.newyorkmustangs.com/forum...cs-t15096.html
AKA; mike65, member here since 12/00.
MikeG69 is offline  
post #8 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 04:30 PM
Senior Member
 
TheRktmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Mills County, Texas
Posts: 439
In 2012 I paid $1000 for my 85 GMC 1500 Sierra Classic - basically a Silverado. It has factory A/C, AT, PS, PDB, Cruise, Am-FM stereo w/ 4 speakers, Power windows, Power locks, rally wheels, S&T rear bumper, dual fuel tanks and Intermittent wipers.
In 2017 I bought four new tires and switched out the AM-FM for a stock looking AM-FM with MP3 jack. Also did the brakes all the way around and replaced a weeping axle seal. Last year I replaced the tired 305-4V with a 350-4v crate motor and got some Weathertek floor mats and installed a couple of USB ports.
I can work on it, parts are cheap, I can haul lumber, brush, car parts, whatever I want without worrying about scratches and dings. It gets about 18 MPG around town and doing 75 out on the highway.
I'm into it for about $5000 and figure she's good for another 100K miles. I'd rather have an old truck any day.
myfirstcar66 likes this.

Bob

Contact and business info removed to comply with new management ad rules.
TheRktmn is offline  
post #9 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 04:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeG69 View Post
I am very happy with my 2000 Ranger 4x4. I priced out a new Ranger & OMG are they expensive. Everything I need to carry I can fit in my Ranger, if I need to carry a sheet of plywood slid it down in the front of the bed & out over the top of the tail gate, works great. I can still get stuff out of or into the bed over the side also.
While I'm glad you like your Ranger, that method isn't going to work very well with 10-20 sheets of drywall ....

I agree, new full size trucks are made to look impressive and tough, not for actual work. My 2000 K2500 has a much more practical load height. New 1/2-3/4 Ton trucks also have horrible visibility looking over that tall hood.

'65 A-code coupe, T-10 4-speed, 8" 3.25 limited slip
stephen_wilson is offline  
post #10 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
 
silverblueBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 7,726
Garage
I have no idea why everyone seems to have such a problem with new trucks. My 2018 F350 4WD Dually kicks arse. It’ll pull 16,000 lbs like it’s not there and haul anything I toss in the bed. So I have to climb on the bumper to get in, whoop de freak’n doo.
Trucks keep getting bigger and so do the things we tow.


Mark
vegasloki likes this.

-Mark-

1966 Mustang 2+2

silverblueBP is offline  
post #11 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,890
The point is, there's no reason for them to be so tall, other than styling. Them being taller has nothing to do with tow ratings, and it doesn't give you any more space for hauling material. Loading things like a motorcycle or lawnmower are especially difficult with such tall load heights. I'm not just talking about throwing in some 2x4's now and then, and obviously it isn't a factor in towing.
elcam84 likes this.

'65 A-code coupe, T-10 4-speed, 8" 3.25 limited slip

Last edited by stephen_wilson; 08-19-2019 at 05:43 PM.
stephen_wilson is offline  
post #12 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 06:13 PM
Senior Member
 
silverblueBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 7,726
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen_wilson View Post
The point is, there's no reason for them to be so tall, other than styling. Them being taller has nothing to do with tow ratings, and it doesn't give you any more space for hauling material. Loading things like a motorcycle or lawnmower are especially difficult with such tall load heights. I'm not just talking about throwing in some 2x4's now and then, and obviously it isn't a factor in towing.


Really? So you can’t put more sheets of X in a taller box? How does that math work? My fuel jugs didn’t fit under the bed cover in my 2000 F250. They do now, what’s not to like?

The trucks are bigger overall. Beefier frames, axels, engines, trans, etc...That equates to higher tow capabilities. The companies just making them bigger and more HD because people want just the looks is BS. Where’s the tech to back that up?

I do like vans for carrying stuff that can’t get wet. When I ran the millwork shop in Kansas, we switched from a F250 to a hd van and it worked great for hauling lots of things. Trailers were not one of them.

They both have their specialties.


Mark

-Mark-

1966 Mustang 2+2

silverblueBP is offline  
post #13 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 06:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,890
You're just being naďve if you don't think they're doing it for the looks. There's really no point in arguing our opinions further.

'65 A-code coupe, T-10 4-speed, 8" 3.25 limited slip
stephen_wilson is offline  
post #14 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 06:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Turnall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dothan, AL
Posts: 4,527
You can actually still buy the old ones that are not as tall if that's what you REALLY, REALLY want...may have some miles on them, but at least you won't need to use the steps provided on the new ones to get in and out of the beds...

Allen

My build thread: Allen's Build Thread

My go fast build thread: Go Fast Build Thread
Turnall is offline  
post #15 of 20 (permalink) Old 08-19-2019, 06:58 PM
Senior Member
 
66#3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 286
Garage
I drive a 2003 F150. It's a full size pickup, short bed, standard cab. In the parking lots, it really looks small compared to "modern" trucks. I reminds me how small my little 1996 Mazda B2300 (Ford Ranger with different badges) looked next to standard pickups back then. The difference is the bed. My Mazda seemed like it could fit in the bed of its bigger brothers. But my F150's bed isn't much different in size (as far as I can tell) from today's trucks. In fact, I suspect that my old short box is probably BIGGER than many of the 4-door double plus extended cab boxes today. Mine holds two people plus a couple of Big Gulps up front. Everything else has to go in the bed.

Bill

6F07C
Color: Y
Trim: 22
Axle: 6
Trans: 6
Build Date: July 18, 1966


66#3 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome