Engine choices - Vintage Mustang Forums
 15Likes
  • 1 Post By awhtx
  • 2 Post By CantedValve
  • 1 Post By buckeyedemon
  • 2 Post By Chrisss31
  • 2 Post By dobrostang
  • 2 Post By patrickstapler
  • 2 Post By Flatheadpopup
  • 2 Post By Chaplin
  • 1 Post By bmcgc
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-15-2018, 11:07 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 514
Engine choices

Okay all I have a choice to make. I recently picked up a 67 FB, no engine or tranny, needs a complete restoration. That is the easy part. My dilemma is my engine choice. The choices are
1. Built and stroked 351c
2. Built 1965 427 top oiler

Both engines need to be built so I already know there is a significant cost in that. The car is going to be built for show and driving. With the 351c it will handle corners better. With the 427 it will be a total explosion of power. My original thought was to build a Super Snake clone with the 427, but I recently acquired a 351c and I love the sound of them. I know it is my car and I should build it how I want, but I want all of your opinions. A 427 would look and sound bad azz and have a huge WOW factor. The 351c would be fast and lethal, sound like nothing else and handle better.

So let’s get those opinions.

LJ

http://imageshack.com/a/img845/1663/pg2f.jpg

1951 F1
1957 Chevy 210 2dr Post
1962 Galaxie 500XL Convertable
1963 Corvette Stingray (original survivor car)
1966 Coupe Mustang
1967 Mustang FB
1970 MACH 1
1972 Chevelle (402, 4spd)
2007 Roush Blackjack #10 of 100
Lawnjockey is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-15-2018, 11:17 PM
Senior Member
 
awhtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Hill Country of Central Texas
Posts: 8,991
427 with a 428 crankshaft.
Lawnjockey likes this.
awhtx is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-16-2018, 12:03 AM
Senior Member
Supporting Member
 
Redneckgearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sauk Centre MN.
Posts: 1,776
A 351w stroked to 427.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk

Scott

Never let the truth get in the way of a good story
Redneckgearhead is online now  
 
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-16-2018, 12:18 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redneckgearhead View Post
A 351w stroked to 427.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Sorry but no 351w

http://imageshack.com/a/img845/1663/pg2f.jpg

1951 F1
1957 Chevy 210 2dr Post
1962 Galaxie 500XL Convertable
1963 Corvette Stingray (original survivor car)
1966 Coupe Mustang
1967 Mustang FB
1970 MACH 1
1972 Chevelle (402, 4spd)
2007 Roush Blackjack #10 of 100
Lawnjockey is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-16-2018, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Rorin67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At the beach in SoCal
Posts: 2,808
Garage
Here: https://forums.vintage-mustang.com/v...51c-460-a.html

Over 100,000 miles spiritedly driven since 2006!
Formula for a daily driver street fighter in Los Angeles:
'67 Fastback + Built 351W + T5 + 3.55:1 + LTs + 2.5" + 40s + TT2 17"
+ Arning drop + CSRP + R&P + Bilsteins + SFCs + under riders + 22 Gal.
+ 3pts + 2nd Skin + MTF grille/lights + LEDs + BlueTooth + SiriusXM

MTF Grille/Light Kit Install w/ Pics... & Engine Bay Pics...
As featured in Hot Rod Magazine tech article, May 2014
Rorin67 is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-16-2018, 04:03 PM
Senior Member
 
CantedValve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntertown, Indiana
Posts: 6,031
I am going to diverge from my canned response of "if you have a 351C, run it" because in a 1967, a 427 just feels right. I say go with the 427. You arent racing it... its a driver and show car. Handling shouldn't be that big of a deal. Nothing is going to pop better under the hood than a 427 (unless you get crazy stupid with the Coyotes or such) at a car show.
Lawnjockey and Dave R. like this.
CantedValve is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-16-2018, 06:25 PM
Senior Member
 
buckeyedemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,976
as a spectator, I would prefer to see an FE in a 67 as opposed to a Cleveland. however, if done right a Cleveland could look the part too.

as a driver of a classic, I can't find myself to push the envelope in the corners on the street anyways (too risky). so the added weight in terms of cornering wouldn't seem to be that big of a deal to me (plus if a host of aluminum/headers are used as opposed to cast iron that seems like it would increase the margins...).
Lawnjockey likes this.

buckeyedemon is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-18-2018, 11:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Chrisss31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Woodstock, CT
Posts: 165
I say 427 too, they have a cool unique sound too!
Lawnjockey and Dave R. like this.
Chrisss31 is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 08:19 AM
Senior Member
 
dobrostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,740
427 is gonna “show” much better amd irs gonna be much more fun to say.
Lawnjockey and Dave R. like this.

Heavy Metal Thunder Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW3L_O7N_xs
dobrostang is online now  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 09:10 AM
Moderator
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 8,408
Garage
Not that you are going to be racing, but this thread defies the whole 427 is to heavy for road racing. I even questioned it before watching the video a couple of times. Boy was I proven wrong.

https://forums.vintage-mustang.com/t...eos.html?amp=1
Lawnjockey and Dave R. like this.

Regards,
Patrick
patrickstapler is online now  
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 11:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Flatheadpopup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: colorado springs, colorado
Posts: 113
My vote would be for the 427. I love the Clevelands but a 67 just begs for the FE!
Lawnjockey and Dave R. like this.

65 Mustang Coupe--363 Stroker, Performer RPM dual quad with two 600 cfm Edelbrock carbs, Astro A5 and 3.89 geared Currie 9".


Flatheadpopup is offline  
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 12:12 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickstapler View Post
Not that you are going to be racing, but this thread defies the whole 427 is to heavy for road racing. I even questioned it before watching the video a couple of times. Boy was I proven wrong.

https://forums.vintage-mustang.com/t...eos.html?amp=1
I have watched that Gold mustang race at PIR. It really gets with the program and handles extremely well... So 427 it is. I should probably do a build thread on just the motor.
Thanks for everyone’s input. I do appreciate it.

LJ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CA545311-A1B2-46FF-881B-ECB09361414E.jpg (374.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg A1AB41AB-CA79-4E6F-AAC5-FF67CC744347.jpg (301.3 KB, 10 views)

http://imageshack.com/a/img845/1663/pg2f.jpg

1951 F1
1957 Chevy 210 2dr Post
1962 Galaxie 500XL Convertable
1963 Corvette Stingray (original survivor car)
1966 Coupe Mustang
1967 Mustang FB
1970 MACH 1
1972 Chevelle (402, 4spd)
2007 Roush Blackjack #10 of 100
Lawnjockey is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 07:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 921
If use use aluminum heads and manifold on the FE, the weight issue tends to become a non-issue. I've got a FE in one of my cars and I love it, but everything FE is more expensive. Cleveland isn't much better. Personally, I'd go with a 408W over an FE or Cleveland simply for the physical size and cost factor. But there is no denying the sound and torque of a well built FE!
Lawnjockey and Chrisss31 like this.
Chaplin is online now  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-19-2018, 10:07 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaplin View Post
If use use aluminum heads and manifold on the FE, the weight issue tends to become a non-issue. I've got a FE in one of my cars and I love it, but everything FE is more expensive. Cleveland isn't much better. Personally, I'd go with a 408W over an FE or Cleveland simply for the physical size and cost factor. But there is no denying the sound and torque of a well built FE!

My Cleveland collection. One is for my 70 MACH 1, another is for my sons 66 coupe and the other is going in a buddies 51 F1 Pickup. I have two other blocks to build one more 550 HP Cleveland.

LJ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 93C89C5A-530D-45EF-8EC5-E27D2F69BF85.jpg (474.4 KB, 13 views)

http://imageshack.com/a/img845/1663/pg2f.jpg

1951 F1
1957 Chevy 210 2dr Post
1962 Galaxie 500XL Convertable
1963 Corvette Stingray (original survivor car)
1966 Coupe Mustang
1967 Mustang FB
1970 MACH 1
1972 Chevelle (402, 4spd)
2007 Roush Blackjack #10 of 100
Lawnjockey is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old 10-20-2018, 10:08 AM
Senior Member
 
bmcgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,978
One day you will sell and the 427 will be a bigger wow factor, and the wow factor brings more money.
Lawnjockey likes this.


1965 Mustang Coupe 289/C4
1967 Mustang Coupe 200/C4
2017 Mustang EB Premium
bmcgc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome