Borgeson Power steering - Vintage Mustang Forums
  • 2 Post By reevescajr
  • 1 Post By Westmus
  • 1 Post By CP66
  • 1 Post By Rowdy
  • 2 Post By RonC65
Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 08:00 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
jas5489's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lutz, Florida
Posts: 11
Borgeson Power steering

I am looking at changing from manual steering to the Borgeson power steering set up. I have headers on my sbf and was wondering if there is any clearance problems with the hoses from the pump to the box?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6EE1C7DC-61FB-4FBC-B854-479605F91E1F.jpg (377.0 KB, 20 views)
jas5489 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 09:23 AM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 64
I have shorty headers in my '66 (no a/c); the only problem I had is that one of the hoses was too short. I don't recall if the header had anything to do with that. I'm attaching a photo of how I fixed the problem.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_1004.jpeg (470.7 KB, 19 views)
jas5489 and oscarnielsen like this.
reevescajr is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 10:00 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 516
Another way to do the lines: I made a homemade power conversion with a box similar to the Borgeson design. My lines run below the engine mount and up between the tower and the box. At the box they are close to the inderfinder, away from the exhaust pipes. The lines was made by using Russell PowerFlex hose (for the pressure line) and Powerflex fittings and the hoses are very slim.
jas5489 likes this.
Westmus is online now  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 10:18 AM
Senior Member
CP66's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mooresville, IN
Posts: 199
I'm using the Borgeson box with a 351w installation and have been looking at the header situation. I contacted one manufacturer and they are familiar with the borgeson and they said it actually gives more clearance than the factory box. My car didn't have one when I got it so I can't confirm or deny that statement. It is an easy way to do it and as Westmus said, you'll probably be fabbing hoses anyway so route them properly and you shouldn't have a problem.
jas5489 likes this.

So Many Cones, So Little Time!
CP66 is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 12:35 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Chilliwack BC
Posts: 709
The Borgeson box is bigger. Most Tri-y and shorty headers should clear it though. I have seen some need massaging.

Are they still shipping the V8 kit with a line thats too short? I had to build my own
jas5489 likes this.
Rowdy is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-18-2019, 07:39 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 8
I ordered the Borgeson kit with their lines for a 6-cylinder engine. These lines are a bit longer as confirmed with a call to Borgeson, and they allowed more clearance from my 289 with JBA Tri-Y headers.
baseballcrazy and jas5489 like this.
RonC65 is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 08-11-2019, 06:10 PM
Junior Member
Djh69's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 10
Looking at this as well. How does the Borgeson box work? Is it nice and smooth?
Djh69 is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 08-11-2019, 08:06 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,332
I run the borgeson in my 65 with MAC long tube headers and clearance isn't an issue at all. I feel it was a great addition to the car. The installation was rather easy, the feel is tight and the power assist can be changed by swapping out the flow control valve in the saginaw pump

65 coupe 5.0L/5 speed
2001 Lightning #1757
Lightning is online now  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 08-11-2019, 08:21 PM
Senior Member
69XR7RestoMod's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Florida
Posts: 153
Iím running the borgeson box with a 408 and FPA headers. No clearance issues. Made custom lines so I could control the routing rather than use their lines. I hear the v8 lines can be short and using the 6 cyl lines solves the problem, but making lines is not that hard.

69 XR-7 408w, FiTech, TKO-600
69XR7RestoMod is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 08-11-2019, 09:30 PM
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hamilton, Ohio
Posts: 33
I contacted Bourgeson back few months ago to ask if the system would clear my 408W setup with Hooker Longtube headers and they told me they donít know to just try it and see what happens. But I didnít want to spend $700 to trial fit it LOL. But sounds like it may work from what others are saying....

1969 Mustang Sportsroof
4 speed
CA rust free car
50dan is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Vintage Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome